Bitdefender Total Security Vulnerabilities: Recent Patches and Recommendations

Overview

Bitdefender has issued a security advisory detailing critical vulnerabilities within its flagship products, Bitdefender Total Security and SafePay. These vulnerabilities pose significant risks to users and require urgent patching. 

Bitdefender Total Security serves as a cybersecurity solution designed to protect devices across various platforms against malware, ransomware, and numerous other cyber threats. Its key features include real-time threat detection, privacy safeguards, and performance enhancements. A standout feature, SafePay, is a secure browser that isolates users’ online activities—such as banking and shopping—encrypts transactions to prevent unauthorized access and ensure safe financial interactions.

The vulnerability classification is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) and includes four categories: Critical (9.0-10), High (7.0-9.0), Medium (4.0-6.9), and Low (0.0-3.9). The advisory highlights six high-severity vulnerabilities, each assigned a corresponding CVE ID: CVE-2023-6055, CVE-2023-6056, CVE-2023-6057, CVE-2023-6058, CVE-2023-49567, and CVE-2023-49570. All of these vulnerabilities affect Bitdefender Total Security and SafePay, with patches now available via automatic updates.

Vulnerability Details


CVE-2023-6055: The first vulnerability, identified as CVE-2023-6055, relates to improper certificate validation in Bitdefender Total Security. It has a CVSS score of 8.6, indicating a high severity level. The issue stems from the software’s failure to adequately validate HTTPS website certificates. Specifically, if a site certificate does not include “Server Authentication” in its Extended Key Usage extension, the software incorrectly considers it valid. This flaw can enable an attacker to conduct a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, potentially intercepting and modifying communications between users and websites. To address this issue, an automatic update to version 27.0.25.115 is available.

CVE-2023-6056: Another significant vulnerability, CVE-2023-6056, also carries a high severity score of 8.6. This vulnerability involves the software improperly trusting self-signed certificates, particularly those signed with the RIPEMD-160 hashing algorithm. As a result, attackers can establish MITM SSL connections to arbitrary sites. Users are encouraged to install the automatic update to version 27.0.25.115 to mitigate this risk.

CVE-2023-6057: The third vulnerability, CVE-2023-6057, is found within the HTTPS scanning functionality of Bitdefender Total Security. With a CVSS score of 8.6, this vulnerability arises from the software’s failure to adequately check the certificate chain for DSA-signed certificates, allowing for potential MITM attacks. To resolve this issue, users should apply the automatic update to version 27.0.25.115.

CVE-2023-6058: This vulnerability impacts Bitdefender SafePay and has a high severity score of 8.6. It occurs when SafePay blocks a connection due to an untrusted server certificate, but users have the option to add the site to exceptions. By doing so, the software subsequently trusts the certificate for future HTTPS scans, which can open the door to MITM attacks using self-signed certificates. An automatic update to version 27.0.25.115 is available to fix this vulnerability.

CVE-2023-49567: Another critical vulnerability is CVE-2023-49567, which has the same CVSS score of 8.6. This flaw is due to the software trusting certificates issued using MD5 and SHA1 collision hash functions, enabling attackers to create rogue certificates that appear legitimate. Users should update to version 27.0.25.115 to eliminate this risk.

CVE-2023-49570: This vulnerability also scores 8.6 on the CVSS scale. This vulnerability allows Bitdefender to trust a certificate issued by an unauthorized entity, potentially enabling MITM attacks. To protect against this risk, users should install the automatic update to version 27.0.25.115.

Recommendations and Mitigations

To mitigate the risks associated with these vulnerabilities, the following strategies are recommended:


Organizations should regularly update all software systems with the latest patches from official vendors. Establishing a routine for applying critical patches immediately can reduce vulnerabilities.

A comprehensive strategy should encompass inventory management, patch assessment, testing, deployment, and verification. Automation of these processes can enhance consistency and efficiency.

Implement proper segmentation to protect critical assets from less secure areas. This strategy can help limit exposure and reduce potential attack surfaces.

Organizations should maintain a clear incident response plan detailing how to detect, respond to, and recover from security incidents. Regular testing of this plan is essential to ensure its effectiveness.

Comprehensive monitoring solutions should be in place to detect and analyze suspicious activities. Utilizing Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems can enhance real-time threat detection and response capabilities.

Organizations must proactively evaluate the criticality of their End-of-Life (EOL) products and plan for timely upgrades or replacements to minimize security risks.

Conclusion

The recent vulnerabilities found in Bitdefender Total Security and SafePay highlight critical risks that can undermine users’ cybersecurity defenses. While these products are designed to protect against a myriad of threats, the existence of high-severity vulnerabilities necessitates a proactive approach to patch management. Organizations must remain vigilant, ensuring that their cybersecurity solutions are not only effective but also up-to-date to prevent exploitation.

The post Bitdefender Total Security Vulnerabilities: Recent Patches and Recommendations appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Cyble Sensors Detect Attacks on Java Framework, IoT Devices

Overview

Cyble’s weekly sensor intelligence report detailed more than 30 active attack campaigns against known vulnerabilities.

New attacks were observed against a vulnerability in the Spring Java framework, and more than 400,000 attacks were observed exploiting a known IoT vulnerability.

Cyble’s Vulnerability Intelligence unit also observed thousands of brute-force attacks and hundreds of phishing campaigns.

Here are some highlights from Cyble’s October 17 sensor report sent to clients.

CVE-2024-38816: Spring Java Framework Exploit

CVE-2024-38816 is a high-severity Path Traversal vulnerability in the popular Spring Java framework that is still undergoing NVD assessment. Applications serving static resources through the functional web frameworks WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn are vulnerable to path traversal attacks.

An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests and obtain any file on the file system that is also accessible to the process in which the Spring application is running. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when both of the following are true: the web application uses RouterFunctions to serve static resources, and resource handling is explicitly configured with a FileSystemResource location.

Malicious requests are blocked and rejected when either of the following is true: the Spring Security HTTP Firewall is in use, or the application runs on Tomcat or Jetty.

CVE-2020-11899: Treck TCP/IP Stack

CVE-2020-11899 is a medium-severity Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in the Treck TCP/IP stack, which was developed as an IPv6 implementation for the limited space of embedded devices. The flaw affects Treck TCP/IP versions before 6.0.1.66 and is also part of the “Ripple20” series of vulnerabilities that can lead to data theft, changes in device behavior or function, network intrusion, device takeover, and other malicious activities.

Cyble sensors detected more than 411,000 attacks on the CVE-2020-11899 vulnerability from Oct. 9 to 15, 2024, often in an attempt to gain administrator privileges (image below).

Cyble sensors have detected attacks against other “Ripple20” vulnerabilities during this period—most notably CVE-2020-11900, an IPv4 tunneling Double Free vulnerability also present in the Treck TCP/IP stack before 6.0.1.41—so IoT environments that may contain these vulnerabilities should check for exposures and apply appropriate mitigations.

CISA’s Ripple20 advisory – updated last month – lists 17 industrial, medical, and critical infrastructure device manufacturers whose products were potentially affected by the vulnerabilities.

Linux, PHP, and Other Attacks Persist

Several other recent exploits observed by Cyble remain active. Linux systems remain under attack as threat actors (TAs) have become increasingly resourceful at delivering malware via package managers and other means. CoinMiner, Mirai, and IRCBot attacks remain active threats against Linux systems.

Previously reported vulnerabilities in PHP (CVE-2024-4577), GeoServer (CVE-2024-36401), and AVTECH IP cameras (CVE-2024-7029) also remain under active attack by threat actors.

Phishing Scams Detected by Cyble

Cyble detected 478 new phishing email addresses this week, a multi-week high. Below is a table listing the email subject lines and deceptive email addresses used in six prominent scam campaigns.

E-mail Subject 
Scammers Email ID 
Scam Type 
Description 

ABOUT YOUR PAYMENT… 
dr.sumitra@ukrit.in 
Claim Scam 
Fake refund against claims 

ATTN: Lucky Winner 
santaluciasrspen1@spainmail.com 
Lottery/Prize Scam 
Fake prize winnings to extort money or information 

GOD BLESS YOU…. 
info@advanceairsystem.com 
Donation Scam 
Scammers posing as Donors to donate money 

My Donation 
test@cinematajrobi.ir 
Investment Scam 
Unrealistic investment offers to steal funds or data 

Order 21542906: cleared customs 
support@recryptogen.com  
Shipping Scam 
Unclaimed shipment trick to demand fees or details 

UN Compensation Fund 
info@usa.com 
Government Organization Scam 
Fake government compensation to collect financial details 

Brute-Force Attacks

Cyble sensors detected thousands of brute-force attacks in the most recent report. The top 5 attacker countries and ports targeted were: Vietnam – ports 22 (52%), 3389 (25%), and 445 (22%); attacks originating from the United States targeted ports 5900 (58%), 22 (20%), 3389 (15%), 445 (5%), and 135 (2%). Ukraine, Russia, and Greece majorly targeted ports 3389, 1433, 5900, and 445. Security Analysts are advised to add security system blocks for the attacked ports (such as 22, 3389, 443, 445, 5900, and 3306).

Recommendations and Mitigations

Cyble researchers recommend the following security controls:


Blocking target hashes, URLs, and email info on security systems (Cyble clients received a separate IoC list).

Immediately patch all open vulnerabilities listed here and routinely monitor the top Suricata alerts in internal networks.

Constantly check for Attackers’ ASNs and IPs.

Block Brute Force attack IPs and the targeted ports listed.

Immediately reset default usernames and passwords to mitigate brute-force attacks and enforce periodic changes.

For servers, set up strong passwords that are difficult to guess.

Conclusion

With active threats against multiple systems highlighted, companies need to remain vigilant and responsive. The large number of brute-force attacks and phishing campaigns demonstrates the vulnerability crisis faced by organizations.

To protect their digital assets, organizations should address known vulnerabilities and implement recommended security controls, such as blocking malicious IPs and securing network ports. A proactive and layered security approach will be key in protecting defenses against exploitation and data breaches.

The post Cyble Sensors Detect Attacks on Java Framework, IoT Devices appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Threat actor abuses Gophish to deliver new PowerRAT and DCRAT

Cisco Talos recently discovered a phishing campaign using an open-source phishing toolkit called Gophish by an unknown threat actor.  The campaign involves modular infection chains that are either Maldoc or HTML-based infections and require the victim’s intervention to trigger the infection chain.  Talos discovered an undocumented PowerShell RAT we’re calling PowerRAT,  as one of the payloads and another infamous Remote Access Tool (RAT) DCRAT. We found a few placeholders for base64 encoded PowerShell scripts in the PowerRAT, indicating that the threat actor is actively developing their tools.  

Victimology 

Talos assesses with high confidence that the threat actor is targeting Russian-speaking users based on the language used in the Phishing emails, luring contents of Malicious documents, a masqueraded HTML webpage of Vkontake (VK), a popular social media application amongst Russian speakers, especially in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Azerbaijan.  

 

 

Actor uses Gophish to send phishing emails 

Our analysis of the malicious hyperlinks embedded in the phishing emails disclosed to us the attacker-controlled hosting domains disk-yanbex[.]ru delivered the Malicious Microsoft Word document, and an HTML file embedded with the malicious JavaScript.   

The domain disk-yanbex[.]ru resolves to the IP address 34[.]236[.]234[.]165, an AWS EC2 instance with the fully qualified domain name ec2-34-236-234-165[.]compute-1[.]amazonaws[.]com, during our analysis. We also observed that the same server 34[.]236[.]234[.]165 was reverse resolving to another domain e-connection[.]ru, which also delivered malicious JavaScript-embedded HTML files. Our further analysis of the server 34[.]236[.]234[.]165 disclosed to us that the actor hosted the Gophish toolkit on the server running at port number 3333. Gophish is an Open-Source easy-to-deploy phishing toolkit that is developed to conduct security awareness training according to the tool’s developer.  

Attacker hosting Gophish.

Talos analysis of the phishing email sample’s header showed us that the email was first delivered from server 34[.]236[.]234[.]165, indicating that the threat actor is misusing the Gophish framework in this campaign to deliver phishing emails to their targets.   

Sample Phishing email header. 

Multi-modular Campaign delivers PowerRAT and DCRAT  

The campaign has two initial attack vectors, one based on malicious Word documents and another based on HTML files containing malicious JavaScript. Upon activation, these would lead to the download and activation of PowerRAT or DCRAT depending on the initial vector. Both the attack chains require user intervention to trigger the infections on the compromised machines. 

Maldoc-based infection delivers PowerRAT 

When a victim opens the Microsoft Word document and enables the view contents button displayed in the document banner, the malicious VB macro program executes.  

The macro program initially executes a function that decodes or translates specific encoded symbols in the lure contents of the Word document into their corresponding characters from another alphabet in Cyrillic, transforming the lure contents into readable form. 

We spotted a base64 encoded data blob on the third page of the Word document and the actor used the text color the same as that of the document’s default background color, hiding them from the victim’s view.  

To identify the hidden encoded data, the macro executes a function that searches for specific strings such as “DigitalRSASignature:” and “CHECKSUM” in the content section of the Word document, and when found, it copies the data following the search strings to an array.  

To decode the base64 encoded data blob, the actor uses a custom function called CheckContent() in the macro. It removes any “=” characters which are the padding characters in the encoded data blob and decodes them into two parts in a byte array. The first part is the contents of a malicious HTML application (HTA) file and the second is a PowerShell loader.  

The macro drops the decoded contents of the malicious HTA file to “UserCache.ini.hta” and the PowerShell loader into “UserCache.ini” in the victim machine’s current user profile folder.   

The actor has abused the Windows NT current version autorun registry key called “LOAD”. The registry key “HKEY_CURRENT_USERSOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows NTCurrentVersionLOAD” is used by Windows to automatically launch applications or processes when a user logs into their account. Specifically, this key stores information about programs that are set to load upon user login. It works similarly to other startup mechanisms in Windows (such as the Startup folder or the Run registry keys), but this specific key is less commonly used. The macro after dropping the malicious HTA and the PowerShell loader script in the victim machine user profile folder, it configures the registry key “HKEY_CURRENT_USERSOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows NTCurrentVersionLOAD” with the value “C:Users<Username>UserCache.ini.hta”. 

Finally, the macro checks if there are any headers in the Word documents and deletes the contents of the headers from all sections of the Word document.  

Intermediate phase includes Malicious HTA, JavaScript, and PowerShell Loader  

The malicious HTA “UserCache.ini.hta” is executed through the LOAD registry key when a victim logs into the machine. It drops a JavaScript called “UserCacheHelper.lnk.js” in the victim machine user profile folder and writes a single line code embedding with a PowerShell command to execute the dropped PowerShell Loader masquerading as “UserCache.ini” file. The HTA file executes the JavaScript “UserCacheHelper.lnk.js” using the LOLbin “cscript.exe”. 

Sample of malicious HTA file.

The dropped JavaScript “UserCacheHelper.lnk.js” loads the contents of the “UserCache.ini” and executes it using the Invoke-Expression PowerShell command. The PowerShell Loader script masquerading as the INI file contains base64 encoded data blob of the payload PowerRAT, which decodes and executes in the victim’s machine memory.   

Sample PowerShell Loader script embedded with PowerRAT.

PowerRAT expands the attack vector for further infections  

Talos discovered a new PowerShell remote access tool as one of the payloads in this campaign we are calling PowerRAT that executes in the victim’s machine memory. It has the functionality of executing other PowerShell scripts or commands as directed by the C2 server, enabling the attack vector for further infections on the victim machine.   

The PowerRAT that executes in the victim machine memory initially checks if the JavaScript “UserCacheHelper.lnk.js” exists in the user profile folder and if not found, it will reinfect the victim machine by performing the actions of the PowerShell loader script described in the previous section. Then it hides the “UserCache.ini” by modifying the file attributes to “Hidden”. 

The PowerRAT performs reconnaissance on the victim’s machine by executing a function GetID() which collects the username, computer name, and the system driver letter through the PowerShell command Get-CimInstance. It also collects the drive serial number through the win32_volume class of WMIobject.  The collected data is written to memory in the format <Computername_Username_drive serial number>. 

After performing the reconnaissance, the PowerRAT attempts to connect to the C2 server by sending the collected data of the victim’s machine using a hardcoded URL through the HTTP GET method.  The C2 servers identified in this campaign are 94[.]103[.]85[.]47 located in Russia with the ASN 48282 of Hosting Technology LTD and 5[.]252[.]176[.]55 also geographically located in Russia with the ASN 39798 of MivoCloud SRL.  

When there is no response from the C2 server, the PowerRAT has a placeholder function called offlineworker() that has the functionality to decode an embedded base64 encoded string of a PowerShell script and executes it using the Invoke-Expression command. The actor has built this functionality to keep the infection alive in the victim machine even if the victim’s environment detects the malicious C2 traffic and blocks the connection. We didn’t see any embedded base64 encoded strings in the PowerRAT sample that we analyzed and is likely a placeholder, indicating that the actor is actively developing and updating their tools.  

The PowerRAT generates a random number between 7 – 23 and pauses its execution for (300 + random number) seconds and re-attempts to connect to the C2 server continuously waiting for a response. During our analysis, the C2 servers were not responding, and still, our further analysis of the PowerRAT showed us that the C2 server will likely respond with an XML configuration file having multiple modules with embedded base64 encoded PowerShell commands or scripts.   

The PowerRAT has the functionality to parse the received XML file and search for the sections called config.  It periodically executes the embedded encoded PowerShell commands or scripts, according to their defined intervals and run limits. The PowerRAT continues to run until all commands or scripts in the config sections are executed the required number of times.   

HTML-based infection delivers DCRAT 

Talos discovered that the threat actor is also using HTML files embedded with malicious JavaScript in this campaign that are delivered to the victims through the malicious links in the phishing email, leading to the infection of the DCRAT payload.  

When a victim clicks on the malicious link in the phishing email, a remotely located HTML file containing the malicious JavaScript opens in the victim machine’s browser and simultaneously executes the JavaScript. The JavaScript has a base64 encoded data blob of a 7-ZIP archive of a malicious SFXRAR executable. It decodes the embedded base64 encoded data blob into binary data blob with the type “application/octet-stream” in the memory. A download URL for the binary data blob is created using the URL.createObjectURL() method and assigned to a variable in memory. It calls the click() method on the URL of the binary data blob which triggers the download of the binary data to a 7-Zip archive file. The malicious 7-Zip archive masquerades as the VK messenger application archive file in one of the malicious HTML files and another with a Russian name. The actor is using this technique in the JavaScript function to masquerade as the actual download activity of a file over the internet through a browser.  

A victim must inflate the 7-Zip archive manually to run the SFXRAR executable which is masquerading as the legitimate VK application executable which leads to DCRAT infection. The SFX RAR executable is packaged with the malicious loader or dropper executables, batch file, and a decoy document in some samples.  

When a victim runs the SFX executable, the SFX script drops the packaged files into a folder and executes the batch file which runs another password-protected SFXRAR with the hardcoded password “riverdD” and runs the DCRAT.   

In another sample, we observed that the SFXRAR drops the GOLoader and the decoy document Excel spreadsheet in the victim machine user profile applications temporary folder and runs the GOLoader along with opening the decoy document.   

Talos observed an overlap of the technique used by the threat actor in this campaign with an earlier SparkRAT attack reported by Hunt researchers in April 2024, indicating that SparkRAT is another payload in the threat actor’s arsenal. 

GOLoader downloads and runs the DCRAT 

In DCRAT infection, the SFX script runs a malicious Loader executable and simultaneously opens a decoy document. The malicious loader executable we are calling “GOLoader” is compiled in Golang. It modifies the configuration settings for Microsoft Defender Antivirus, specifically by excluding the root directory “C:” and the folder “C:Users$userDesktop” in the victim machine by executing the PowerShell commands.  

powershell -Command Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath ‘C:Users$userDesktop’

powershell -Command Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath ‘C:’

After configuring the exclusion paths, the GOLoader downloads the DCRAT binary data stream from a remote location through a hardcoded URL and writes it into a dropped executable with the file name “file.exe” in the desktop folder on the victim’s machine. During our analysis, we found that the remote location URL hardcoded in the GOLoader was pointing to a GitHub repository, which was not accessible. However, we found that the hosted payload binary in the GitHub repository is the Dark Crystal RAT (DCRAT) binary based on open-source intelligence data.   

Threat actor delivers DCRAT 

The payload Dark Crystal RAT (DCRAT) sample that we analyzed in this campaign is a modular RAT associated with plugins to perform the DLL injection and information stealing tasks.  

Key features of the DCRAT sample of this campaign include: 

Provides remote control access to the victim machine to the actor who can execute arbitrary commands, manage files, and monitor user activities.  It has the capability of downloading and executing other files on the victim’s machine. With its stealer plugin modules, the RAT can steal sensitive information including credentials, files, and financial information from the victim’s machine.  The RAT can take screenshots and capture the keystrokes on the victim’s machine. We found that the RAT creates multiple copies of its binary masquerading as legitimate Windows executables including csrss.exe, dllhost.exe, taskhostw.exe, and winlogon.exe in the folders such as ProgramData, Pictures, Saved Games, and Windows start menu. It drops the embedded modules in the administrator user desktop folder using random file names and with the “.log” file extension.  

C:UsersadminDesktopzaHrebVC.log

C:UsersadminDesktopHQLYdHol.log

C:UsersadminDesktopqJutJUJW.log

C:UsersDefaultAppDataRoamingMicrosoftWindowsStart Menutaskhostw.exe

C:ProgramDatadllhost.exe

C:UsersDefaultPicturescsrss.exe

C:UsersDefaultSaved Gameswinlogon.exe


It establishes persistence on the victim machine by creating several Windows tasks to run at different intervals or during the Windows login process. 

Task Scheduler Commands

schtasks.exe /create /tn “winlogonw” /sc MINUTE /mo 11 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultSaved Gameswinlogon.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “winlogon” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultSaved Gameswinlogon.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “winlogonw” /sc MINUTE /mo 5 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultSaved Gameswinlogon.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “csrssc” /sc MINUTE /mo 12 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultPicturescsrss.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “csrss” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultPicturescsrss.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “csrssc” /sc MINUTE /mo 7 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultPicturescsrss.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhostd” /sc MINUTE /mo 11 /tr “‘C:UsersPublicdllhost.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhost” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersPublicdllhost.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhostd” /sc MINUTE /mo 12 /tr “‘C:UsersPublicdllhost.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhostd” /sc MINUTE /mo 8 /tr “‘C:UsersAll Usersdllhost.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhost” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersAll Usersdllhost.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “dllhostd” /sc MINUTE /mo 11 /tr “‘C:UsersAll Usersdllhost.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “taskhostwt” /sc MINUTE /mo 6 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultStart Menutaskhostw.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “taskhostw” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultStart Menutaskhostw.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “taskhostwt” /sc MINUTE /mo 10 /tr “‘C:UsersDefaultStart Menutaskhostw.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “filef” /sc MINUTE /mo 13 /tr “‘C:UsersadminAppDataLocalTempfile.exe'” /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “file” /sc ONLOGON /tr “‘C:UsersadminAppDataLocalTempfile.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f

schtasks.exe /create /tn “filef” /sc MINUTE /mo 9 /tr “‘C:UsersadminAppDataLocalTempfile.exe'” /rl HIGHEST /f


The RAT communicates to the C2 server through a URL hardcoded in the RAT configuration file as shown in the picture and exfiltrates the sensitive data collected from the victim machine. From other DCRAT samples identified in this campaign, we found another C2 URL “hxxp[://]cr87986[.]tw1[.]ru/L1nc0In[.]php”.  Sample of DCRAT configuration file. 

Coverage 

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here. 

Cisco Secure Web Appliance web scanning prevents access to malicious websites and detects malware used in these attacks. 

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Appliance and Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat. 

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products. 

Umbrella, Cisco’s secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network. Sign up for a free trial of Umbrella here

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them. 

Additional protection with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from the Firewall Management Center

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network. 

Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org. Snort SIDs for this threat are 63963 – 63970, 63971 and 301004. 

ClamAV detections are also available for this threat: 

Win.Downloader.RustAgent-10036537-0 

Win.Downloader.RustAgent-10036538-0 

Win.Downloader.RustAgent-10036539-0 

Win.Downloader.GoAgent-10036540-0 

Win.Backdoor.PowershellRAT-10036541-0 

Win.Phishing.VbsAgent-10036542-0 

Win.Phishing.JsAgent-10036543-0 

Win.Loader.PowershellLoader-10036544-0 

Win.Loader.HtaAgent-10036545-0 

Win.Loader.DonutLoader-10036546-0

IOCs 

IOCs for this research can be found in our GitHub repository here

Cisco Talos Blog – ​Read More

Malware Trends Report: Q3, 2024

We’re excited to share ANY.RUN‘s latest malware trends analysis for Q3 2024.

Our quarterly update provides insights into the most widely deployed malware families, types, and TTPs we saw during the last 3 months of the year.

Summary

Users launched over 1M sandbox sessions in Q3 2024

In Q3 2024, ANY.RUN users ran 1,090,457 public interactive analysis sessions, which is a 23.7% increase from Q2 2024. Out of these, 211,770 (19.4%) were marked as malicious, and 47,375 (4.3%) as suspicious.  

Compared to the previous quarter, the percentage of malicious sandbox sessions increased slightly from 18.4% in Q2 2024 to 19.4% in Q3 2024. The share of suspicious sessions saw a decline from 7.0% to 4.3%.  

As for indicators of compromise, users collected a total of 570,519,029 IOCs this quarter.

Collect threat intel on the latest malware and phishing campaigns with TI Lookup 



Get 20 free requests


Top Malware Types in Q3 2024   

Stealers dominated the threat landscape in Q3 2024

Let’s take a closer look at the most common malware types identified by ANY.RUN’s sandbox. 

Stealer: 16,511

Loader: 8,197 

RAT: 7,191 

Ransomware: 5,967 

Miner: 3,880 

Keylogger: 3,172 

Backdoor: 811 

Installer: 640 

Trojan: 507 

Compared to Q1 and Q2 of 2024, the ANY.RUN sandbox saw a significant increase in the detection of malware in Q3. A major reason for this is the growing number of public samples being uploaded by our 500,000-strong community of security analysts. Our team is also continuously improving the service’s capabilities, resulting in broader threat coverage. 

Top malware types: highlights  

In Q3, Stealers were the most common malware type detected, returning to the first spot since the start of the year after falling to the fourth place in Q2. They saw a serious rise in detections, reaching 16,511 in Q3.  

Loaders maintained a strong presence, securing the second position for another quarter in a row. Their detections have seen a 49% rise from 5,492 to 8,197.

After leading in Q2, RATs dropped to the third spot, with 7,191 detections. 

Trojan and Installer malware experienced a substantial decrease, shedding 3,704 and 2,466 detections correspondingly. Ransomware increased by 3,021, indicating a rise in this type of threat.  

Top Malware Families in Q3 2024   

Lumma, AsyncRAT and Remcos became top threats in Q3 2024

Lumma: 4,140 

AsyncRAT: 3,053  

Remcos: 2,548    

Agent Tesla: 2,316  

XWorm: 2,188  

Stealc: 2,030  

Snake: 1,782  

MetaStealer: 1,663  

Cobalt Strike: 1,262 

Top malware families: highlights 

In Q3 2024, the malware landscape saw notable shifts. Despite not being present on the Q2 ranking, Lumma emerged as the leading threat, recording 4,140 instances. 

AsyncRAT went from 670 detections in Q2 to 3,053 in Q3, followed by Remcos whose detections almost doubled from 1,282 to 2,548.  

Agent Tesla also showed an increase, jumping from 439 detections to 2,316, which is still more than its Q4 2023 result, when it topped the malware families chart. 

Several new families made their debut in Q3, including XWorm with 2,188 detections and Stealc with 2,030.

Learn to Track Emerging Cyber Threats

Check out expert guide to collecting intelligence on emerging threats with TI Lookup



Top MITRE ATT&CK techniques in Q3 2024

Disable Windows Event Logging became top TTP in Q3 2024

The MITRE ATT&CK framework categorizes adversary behavior into tactics and techniques, helping malware analysts more efficiently identify, assess, and respond to threats.

Here are the top 20 techniques observed in Q3 2024: 

#  

MITRE ATT&CK Technique    

№ of detections  

1  

Impair Defenses: Disable Windows Event Logging, T1562.002  

63,027 

2  

Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell, T1059.001 

46,155 

3  

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell, T1059.003 

41,384 

4  

Masquerading: Rename System Utilities, T1036.003 

41,254 

5  

Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: Time Based Evasion, T1497.003 

39,021 

6  

Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder, T1547.001 

23,937  

7  

System Binary Proxy Execution: Rundll32, T1218.011  

21,896 

8  

Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task, T1053.005  

16,718 

9  

Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location, T1036.005 

15,594 

10  

Phishing: Spearphishing Link, T1566.002 

15,110 

11  

Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers, T1555.003  

14,723 

12  

System Services: Service Execution, T1569.002 

14,257 

13  

Email Collection: Local Email Collection, T1114.001  

10,807 

14  

Create or Modify System Process: Systemd Service, T1543.002  

10,558 

15  

Scheduled Task/Job: Systemd Timers, T1053.006 

10,558 

16  

Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools, T1562.001 

6,917 

17  

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix Shell T1059.004 

6,634 

18  

Command and Scripting Interpreter: Visual Basic T1059.005 

6,602 

19  

Software Discovery: Security Software Discovery T1518.001 

6,258 

20  

Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion: System Checks T1497.001 

6,003 

Top TTPs: Q3 2024 vs Q2 2024 

The first three spots were taken accordingly by:

T1562.002, Impair Defenses: Disable Windows Event Logging — new entry. 

T1059.001: Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell — up from the 7th spot in Q2. 

T1059.003, Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell — rose from the 6th spot, nearly doubling in detections. 

The worthy mentions: 

T1114.001, Local Email Collection, was pushed down from the top spot in Q2 to the 13th position with 10,807 detections. 

T1036.003, Rename System Utilities, dropped from the 3d spot in the previous quarter to 4th, registering 41,254 instances. 

T1497.003, Time Based Evasion, despite falling to the 5th spot from 2nd in Q2, saw an increase in detections, bringing the figure to 39,021. 

Report methodology    

For our report, we looked at data from 1,090,457 interactive analysis sessions. This information comes from researchers in our community who contributed by running public analysis sessions in ANY.RUN.  

About ANY.RUN

ANY.RUN helps more than 500,000 cybersecurity professionals worldwide. Our interactive sandbox simplifies malware analysis of threats that target both Windows and Linux systems. Our threat intelligence products, TI Lookup, YARA Search and Feeds, help you find IOCs or files to learn more about the threats and respond to incidents faster.

Integrate ANY.RUN’s services in your organization →

The post Malware Trends Report: Q3, 2024 appeared first on ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog.

ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog – ​Read More

Akira ransomware continues to evolve

Akira continues to cement its position as one of the most prevalent ransomware operations in the threat landscape, according to Cisco Talos’ findings and analysis.

Their success is partly due to the fact that they are constantly evolving. For example, after Akira already developed a new version of their ransomware encryptor earlier in the year, we just recently observed another novel iteration of the encryptor targeting Windows and Linux hosts alike. 

Previously, Akria typically employed a double-extortion tactic in which critical data is exfiltrated prior to the compromised victim systems becoming encrypted. Beginning in early 2024, Akira appeared to be sidelining the encryption tactics, focusing on data exfiltration only. We assess with low to moderate confidence that this shift was due in part to the developers taking time to further retool their encryptor. 

During this period, we began to see Akira ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operators developing a Rust variant of their ESXi encryptor, iteratively building on the payload’s functions while moving away from C++ and experimenting with different programming techniques.  

Most recently, we have observed a potential shift back to previous encryption methods, in conjunction with data theft extortion tactics.  

Returning to this approach leverages the reliability of tested encryption techniques, while simultaneously capitalizing on data theft for additional leverage. Pivoting to a previously effective strategy post-language reimplementation with v2 indicates a refocus on stability and efficiency in affiliate operations. 

We anticipate Akira will continue refining its tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), developing its attack chain, adapting to shifts in the threat landscape, and striving for greater effectiveness in its RaaS operations, targeting both Windows and Linux-based enterprise environments. 

Members of our team will be delving into this prickly threat actor presenting at the upcoming MITRE ATT&CKCon 5.0 in ‘GoGo Ransom Rangers: Diving into Akira’s Linux Variant with ATT&CK’. Join us as we uncover findings about the TTPs employed by this developing threat actor, dissect their attack chain, and actionable intelligence is vital in the threat protection pipeline.

“The future is not a straight line. It is filled with many crossroads” Kiyoko

2024 attack chain: Leveraging exposed network appliances and vulnerable systems for rapid compromise 

As Akira continuously refines its ransomware, affiliates are equally proactive in selecting and exploiting new vulnerabilities for initial access, adapting their tactics in tandem. They leverage newly disclosed CVEs, not only to breach networks but also to escalate privileges and move laterally within compromised environments. This allows them to establish a greater foothold to swiftly deploy encryption and exfiltrate victim data for extortion. 

Akira ransomware operators have utilized a variety of common infection vectors to gain initial access to targeted networks, often favoring the use of compromised VPN credentials. 

Most recently, Akira ransomware affiliates have been observed targeting network appliances vulnerable to CVE-2024-40766, an exploit in the SonicWall SonicOS facilitating remote code execution on the vulnerable device. Security researchers found that software on the affected systems was vulnerable to this exploit, suggesting affiliates’ swift capitalization on exposed systems. 

Additional vulnerabilities leveraged by affiliates throughout 2024 include: 

CVE-2020-3259 and CVE-2023-20263: In similar Cisco security appliance exploits leveraged in early 2024, Akira was observed abusing a flaw in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) with CVE-2020-3259 and CVE-2023-20263 via Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) software that allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code, after initial access was established post Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN compromise. CVE-2023-48788: Exposed and vulnerable FortiClientEMS software abuse by Akira was observed for initial access, enabling lateral movement and privilege escalation. 

Once initial access is established, Akira operators utilize PowerShell scripts to conduct credential harvesting and privilege escalation, such as extracting Veeam backup credentials and dumping Kerberos authentication credentials. Additionally, we often see affiliates delete system shadow copies to obstruct file recovery via Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI): “Get-WmiObject Win32_Shadowcopy | Remove-WmiObject”. 

Operators typically utilize RDP connections and lateral tool transfers to move through the network and employ a variety of defense evasion techniques, such as binary padding, matching legitimate name or location taxonomy, and disabling or modifying security tools. 

In an attack targeting a Latin American airline in June 2024, RaaS operators were able to exploit key vulnerable services and deploy the ransomware payload in a manner that drastically reduced the time to exfiltrate data. Initially gaining access via Secure Shell (SSH), it was reported that the adversary obtained access to the vulnerable Veeam backup server likely via CVE-2023-27532, resulting in the access of encrypted credentials stored in the configuration database. This foothold facilitated the swift deployment of the Akira ransomware variant and exfiltration of sensitive data. 

Akira ransomware affiliates have actively exploited several additional critical vulnerabilities in 2024 after achieving initial compromise, capitalizing on unpatched vulnerabilities in widely used network appliances and software to establish persistence and move laterally:  

CVE-2023-20269: Akira affiliates were suspected of targeting this vulnerability in Cisco VPN services. The exploit leverages an unauthorized access vulnerability in the remote access VPN feature of ASA and FTD software due to a misconfiguration of improper separation of authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) on the device.  CVE-2024-37085: VMware ESXi vulnerability enabling unauthorized access to the hypervisor’s management interface, which can lead to full control over virtual machines once the adversary has established sufficient Active Directory Permissions. CVE-2024-40711: Akira ransomware was recently seen deployed post exploitation of the Veeam backup and replication service by triggering “Veeam.Backup.MountService.exe” to spawn “net.exe” and create local accounts for privilege escalation and persistence. 

In terms of victimology, we assess that throughout 2024, Akira has targeted a significant number of victims, with a clear preference for organizations in the manufacturing and professional, scientific, and technical services sectors, based on our analysis of Akira’s data leak site. 

A look at the previous Akira v2 ESXi encryptor 

Akira pivoted from their traditional TTPs at the end of 2023 and developed a new Linux encryptor. In March 2024, we shared findings with intelligence partners generated from a Cisco Talos Incident Response (Talos IR) engagement, which documented the newly discovered Akira_v2 and the co-occurring deployment of the adversaries’ Megazord encryptor.  

Post-encryption, we witnessed the Linux ESXi variant appended with a novel encrypted storage file extension “akiranew” dropping a ransom note in each of the directories where files were encrypted with a new nomenclature, “akiranew.txt”. We discovered two additional samples of the Akira_v2 variant (version 2024.1.30) on VirusTotal that included additional modifications to extend its command line argument capabilities, highlighting further evolution in the malware’s development. 

Arguments

Description

–path <string>

Start path. Default value: /vmfs/volumes

–id <string>

Build ID

–stopvm

Stop VMs

–vmonly

Crypt only .vmdk, .vmem, .vmx, .log, .vswp, .vmsd, .vmsn files

–threads <int>

Number of threads (1-1000). Default: number of logical CPU cores

–ep <int>

Percent of crypt. Default – 15%

–fork

Work in background

–logs <string>

Print logs. Valid values for: trace, debug, error, info, warn. Default: off

–exclude <string>

Skip files by “regular” extension. Example: –exclude=”startfilename(.*).(.*)” using this regular expression will skip all files starting with startfilename and having any extensions. Multiple regular expressions using “|” can also be processed: –exclude=”(win10-3(.*).(.*))|(win10-4(.*).(.*))|(win10-5(.*).(.*))”

-h, –help

Show help

The original Linux encryptor was written in C++, with Akira leveraging the Crypto++ library for encryption processes, whereas the v2 Rust variant makes use of rust-crypto 0.2.36 library crate for encryption processes. 

The Build ID for the v2 (version 2024.1.30) was found at offset 0x41970 for 10 bytes. 

In the v2 version targeting ESXi hosts, by default, the encryptor targets the “/vmfs/volumes/” path and will navigate into subdirectories. If this path does not exist or a path is not specified, the ransomware will fail to execute. 

Akira (The Return) to old TTPs 

From our recent analysis, we suspect that Akira may be transitioning from the use of the Rust-based Akira v2 variant and returning to previous TTPs using Windows and Linux encryptors written in C++. This could be because of a potential refocus on incremental iterations with stability and reliability in their operations over innovation. The cross-platform consistency indicates the adversaries’ focus on an adaptable payload, enabling the threat actor to target multiple operating systems with minimal changes. 

In early September 2024, we identified multiple new ransomware samples written in C++, where encrypted files are given the “.akira” extension and a ransom note named “akira_readme.txt” is dropped on the device, consistent with pre-August 2023 versions of the Akira ransomware group’s encryptor. These findings support our assessment of a tactical pivot, signaling a deliberate return to effective techniques, consistent with public reporting on the threat actors’ initial Linux variant. 

We assess with moderate confidence that the Megazord variant, previously used by the threat actor targeting Windows environments, alongside Akira v2 for Linux, has gradually faded away, further supporting a consolidation of tooling by the adversary. 

The newly observed Windows variant has been updated and appears to substitute the previously seen -remote argument for -localonly and –exclude and excludes paths, including “$Recycle.Bin” and “System Volume Information”, in the encryption process. Within the Linux variant, the –fork argument, which creates a child process for encryption, is still included along with the –exclude argument. 

Analysis of the recent binaries suggests that the threat actor has pivoted to utilizing the ChaCha8 stream cipher. The ChaCha8 algorithm is faster and more efficient than the previously leveraged ChaCha20 in Akira v_2 due to the reduced number of quarter-round operations in the cipher, possibly indicating a further focus on swift encryption and exfiltration operations such as seen in recent Akira attacks. 

New extensions targeted in recently observed Linux variants: 

.4d

.abd

.abx

.ade

.ckp

.db

.dd

dpl

.dx

.edb

.fo

.ib

.idb

.mdn

.mud

.nv

.pdb

.sq

.te

.ud

.vdh

Both newly observed encryptor variants employ exclusion paths that ignore identical Windows directories before the encryption process, a return to previous TTPs by the adversary. 

tmp

wint

temp

thumb

$Recycle.Bin

$RECYCLE.BIN

System Volume Information

Boot

Windows

Trend Micro

Future developments in Akira’s TTPs 

Future campaigns are likely to see Akira continuing to prioritize the exploitation of high-impact CVEs while reinforcing its double extortion model to increase ransom leverage.  

The exploration of the Rust programming language in recent Linux encryptors signals the threat actor’s willingness to experiment with different coding frameworks, potentially leading to more developed and resilient ransomware variants. While the return to an earlier variant indicates a potential tactical shift from this code migration, it also demonstrates that the developers remain highly adaptable, willing to reemploy tried-and-tested techniques when necessary to ensure operational stability. Pragmatic adaptability is providing significant advantages for ransomware groups operating in a dynamic threat landscape, as it allows them to maintain a robust and reliable codebase while continually seeking new ways to evade detection and enhance functionality. 

It is possible that Akira’s pivot to pure data-theft extortion at the end of 2023 and beginning of 2024 was a temporary shift during the codebase refactoring, allowing the group to maintain pressure on victims and generate revenue while developmental resources were allocated to refining the encryptor’s functionality. 

We assess that Akira and its affiliates will continue prioritizing attacks against VMWare’s ESXi and Linux environments throughout 2024, echoing a broader trend observed across the ransomware landscape. Adversary targeting of these platforms is driven by their prevalence in enterprise infrastructure, hosting critical infrastructure and high-value data, and their capacity for mass encryption and disruption with minimal lateral movement. Targeting ESXi and Linux hosts allows ransomware operators to compromise multiple virtual machines and critical workloads simultaneously, maximizing operational impact while bypassing traditional endpoint security controls. 

Virtualization is essential to large-scale deployments of cloud computing and storage resources, making ransomware attacks on ESXi hypervisors highly disruptive. Encrypting the ESXi file system provides rapid, widespread data encryption, minimizing the need for extensive lateral movement and credential theft, due to the ease of encrypting a single vmdk, rather than all the files. ESXi hypervisors often lack comprehensive security protection due to security department overhead, making them attractive targets for ransomware operators seeking fruitful targets. 

Recommendations 

Conduct regular vulnerability assessments and timely application of security patches to identify outdated software versions and unpatched vulnerabilities on ESXi hosts and implement a formal threat-informed patch management policy that includes a defined prioritization and schedule for routine updates and emergency patching of critical vulnerabilities. 

Implement strict password policies that require complex, unique passwords for each account. Additionally, enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add an extra layer of security.  

Deploy a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system to continuously monitor and analyze security events, in addition to the deployment of EDR/XDR solutions on all clients and servers to provide advanced threat detection, investigation, and response capabilities.  

Enable secure configuration and access controls to limit access to ESXi management interfaces such as by restricting them to trusted IPs, enforcing MFA, and ensuring role-based access control (RBAC) is properly configured. 

Disable unnecessary WMI access by restricting or disabling WMI access for non-administrative users, and monitor/audit WMI commands, particularly those related to shadow copy deletion. 

Credential dumping prevention via implementing Windows Defender Credential Guard to protect Kerberos ticket data and prevent credential dumping from the Local Security Authority (LSA), ensuring to audit and apply necessary configuration changes to applications/plug-ins that aren’t compatible due to reliance on direct access to user credentials. 

Coverage 

Ways our customers can detect and block this threat are listed below. 

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here.  

Cisco Secure Web Appliance web scanning prevents access to malicious websites and detects malware used in these attacks.  

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here.  

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Appliance and Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat.  

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products.  

Umbrella, Cisco’s secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network. Sign up for a free trial of Umbrella here.  

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them.  

Additional protections with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from theFirewall Management Center.  

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network. 

Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org. SIDs for this threat: 

Snort3: 300924 

Snort3 Rules: 1:301007:1:0 

Snort2: 63541, 63540 

Snort2 Rules: 1:63976:1:0, 1:63977:1:0 

 

ClamAV detections are also available for this threat: 

Multios.Ransomware.Akira-10036536-0 

Multios.Ransomware.Megazord-10021030-1 

IOCs 

Windows (The Return) 

78d75669390e4177597faf9271ce3ad3a16a3652e145913dbfa9a5951972fcb0 

2c7aeac07ce7f03b74952e0e243bd52f2bfa60fadc92dd71a6a1fee2d14cdd77 

88da2b1cee373d5f11949c1ade22af0badf16591a871978a9e02f70480e547b2 

566ef5484da0a93c87dd0cb0a950a7cff4ab013175289cd5fccf9dd7ea430739 

ccda8247360a85b6c076527e438a995757b6cdf5530f38e125915d31291c00d5 

87b4020bcd3fad1f5711e6801ca269ef5852256eeaf350f4dde2dc46c576262d 

988776358d0e45a4907dc1f4906a916f1b3595a31fa44d8e04e563a32557eb42 

  

Linux (The Return) 

3805f299d33ef43d17a5a1040149f0e5e2d5db57ec6f03c5687ac23db1f77a30 

abba655df92e99a15ddcde1d196ff4393a13dbff293e45f5375a2f61c84a2c7b 

a546ef13e8a71a8b5f0803075382eb0311d0d8dbae3f08bac0b2f4250af8add0 

6005dcbe15d60293c556f05e98ed9a46d398a82e5ca4d00c91ebec68a209ea84 

43c5a487329f5d6b4a6d02e2f8ef62744b850312c5cb87c0a414f3830767be72 

8e9a33809b9062c5033928f82e8adacbef6cd7b40e73da9fcf13ec2493b4544c 

bcae978c17bcddc0bf6419ae978e3471197801c36f73cff2fc88cecbe3d88d1a 

3805f299d33ef43d17a5a1040149f0e5e2d5db57ec6f03c5687ac23db1f77a30 

  

Windows v1 

678ec8734367c7547794a604cc65e74a0f42320d85a6dce20c214e3b4536bb33 

6cadab96185dbe6f3a7b95cf2f97d6ac395785607baa6ed7bf363deeb59cc360 

3c92bfc71004340ebc00146ced294bc94f49f6a5e212016ac05e7d10fcb3312c 

1b6af2fbbc636180dd7bae825486ccc45e42aefbb304d5f83fafca4d637c13cc 

5c62626731856fb5e669473b39ac3deb0052b32981863f8cf697ae01c80512e5 

  

Megazord 

dfe6fddc67bdc93b9947430b966da2877fda094edf3e21e6f0ba98a84bc53198 

28cea00267fa30fb63e80a3c3b193bd9cd2a3d46dd9ae6cede5f932ac15c7e2e 

a6b0847cf31ccc3f76538333498f8fef79d444a9d4ecfca0592861cf731ae6cb 

b55fbe9358dd4b5825ce459e84cd0823ecdf7b64550fe1af968306047b7de5c9 

c9c94ac5e1991a7db42c7973e328fceeb6f163d9f644031bdfd4123c7b3898b0 

0c0e0f9b09b80d87ebc88e2870907b6cacb4cd7703584baf8f2be1fd9438696d 

95477703e789e6182096a09bc98853e0a70b680a4f19fa2bf86cbb9280e8ec5a 

e3fa93dad8fb8c3a6d9b35d02ce97c22035b409e0efc9f04372f4c1d6280a481 

68d5944d0419bd123add4e628c985f9cbe5362ee19597773baea565bff1a6f1a 

8816caf03438cd45d7559961bf36a26f26464bab7a6339ce655b7fbad68bb439 

c0c0b2306d31e8962973a22e50b18dfde852c6ddf99baf849e3384ed9f07a0d6 

7f731cc11f8e4d249142e99a44b9da7a48505ce32c4ee4881041beeddb3760be 

2f629395fdfa11e713ea8bf11d40f6f240acf2f5fcf9a2ac50b6f7fbc7521c83 

9f393516edf6b8e011df6ee991758480c5b99a0efbfd68347786061f0e04426c 

9585af44c3ff8fd921c713680b0c2b3bbc9d56add848ed62164f7c9b9f23d065 

131da83b521f610819141d5c740313ce46578374abb22ef504a7593955a65f07 

 

Akira_v2: 

3298d203c2acb68c474e5fdad8379181890b4403d6491c523c13730129be3f75 

0ee1d284ed663073872012c7bde7fac5ca1121403f1a5d2d5411317df282796c 

Cisco Talos Blog – ​Read More

Splunk’s Latest Advisory: Addressing Multiple Vulnerabilities in Splunk Enterprise

Overview

Splunk has recently issued an advisory detailing multiple vulnerabilities discovered in its Splunk Enterprise software. The advisory categorize vulnerabilities into three primary classifications based on their CVSS base scores. In total, there are two vulnerabilities classified as High, with a risk score deemed Critical. The Medium category includes eight vulnerabilities, while there is one vulnerability classified as Low.

The advisory identifies several CVE IDs associated with these vulnerabilities, specifically: CVE-2024-45731, CVE-2024-45732, CVE-2024-45733, CVE-2024-45734, CVE-2024-45735, CVE-2024-45736, CVE-2024-45737, CVE-2024-45738, CVE-2024-45739, CVE-2024-45740, and CVE-2024-45741. Importantly, Splunk has confirmed that patches are available for all identified vulnerabilities, urging users to implement them promptly to mitigate potential risks.

Detailed Vulnerability Analysis

CVE-2024-45731 addresses a critical remote code execution vulnerability, receiving a CVSS score of 8.0, classified as high. This vulnerability affects Splunk Enterprise for Windows in versions below 9.3.1, 9.2.3, and 9.1.6. A low-privileged attacker can exploit this vulnerability by writing a file to the Windows system root directory if Splunk is installed on a separate drive. This action could allow the attacker to load a malicious DLL, leading to remote code execution. To mitigate this risk, users should ensure that Splunk is not installed on a separate disk.

CVE-2024-45732 is categorized as a medium vulnerability, with a CVSS score of 6.5. It impacts various versions below 9.3.1 for both Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Cloud Platform. In this case, a low-privileged user may run searches as the “nobody” Splunk user, potentially gaining access to restricted data. Users are advised to modify the local.meta file to restrict write access and can consider disabling Splunk Web as a workaround.

Another medium vulnerability, CVE-2024-45733, also scores 6.5 and affects Splunk Enterprise for Windows in versions below 9.2.3 and 9.1.6. This vulnerability allows for remote code execution due to insecure session storage configurations. To address this issue, users should disable Splunk Web on indexers in distributed environments where logins are not necessary.

CVE-2024-45734 is classified as medium, with a CVSS score of 4.3, and affects versions of Splunk Enterprise below 9.2.3 and 9.1.6. This vulnerability can be exploited through the PDF export feature, enabling users to view local images from the machine running Splunk Enterprise. Turning off Splunk Web may serve as a mitigation strategy for this risk.

Another instance of improper access control, CVE-2024-45735, also has a CVSS score of 4.3 and affects various versions below 9.2.3 and 9.1.6, including Splunk Secure Gateway versions. This vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to view deployment configurations and keys within the Splunk Secure Gateway App. Users can mitigate this risk by disabling the app if it is not needed or by ensuring proper security settings are in place.

CVE-2024-45736, which scores 6.5 and falls into the medium category, involves uncontrolled resource consumption. This vulnerability can cause the Splunk daemon to crash if a crafted search query is executed. Organizations are advised to implement monitoring and alerting on search query behaviors to identify potential exploit attempts.

CVE-2024-45737 is a low-severity vulnerability, scoring 3.5, affecting various versions below 9.3.1 and 9.2.3. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability through cross-site request forgery (CSRF) to change the maintenance mode state of the App Key Value Store. Turning off Splunk Web may serve as a potential workaround.

Two vulnerabilities, CVE-2024-45738 and CVE-2024-45739, both classified as medium with a CVSS score of 4.9, affect various versions below 9.3.1, 9.2.3, and 9.1.6. These vulnerabilities could expose sensitive HTTP parameters and plaintext passwords due to verbose logging configurations. Users are recommended to adjust logging levels and remove sensitive logs from the internal index to mitigate these risks.

Lastly, CVE-2024-45740 and CVE-2024-45741, both scoring 5.4 and categorized as medium vulnerabilities, affect various versions below 9.2.3 and 9.1.6. These vulnerabilities can be exploited to execute unauthorized JavaScript in user browsers. Disabling Splunk Web can help mitigate these risks.

Recommendations for Organizations


Regularly update all software systems with the latest vendor patches to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Develop a comprehensive strategy that includes inventory management, assessment, testing, and verification of patches.

Isolate critical assets from less secure areas using firewalls, VLANs, and access controls to limit exposure.

Maintain an up-to-date incident response plan to effectively address security incidents as they arise.

Implement robust monitoring solutions to detect and analyze suspicious activities across the network.

Proactively assess critical systems for potential upgrades or replacements to avoid risks associated with outdated software.

Conclusion

Splunk Enterprise and its associated cloud platform are essential tools for organizations focused on advanced log management and security analytics. However, the recent disclosure of multiple vulnerabilities highlights the critical importance of maintaining software updates and installing security patches. 

Organizations that neglect to apply these patches may find themselves exposed to risks, including unauthorized access and data breaches. Thus, users need to stay vigilant and proactive in implementing the recommended mitigations and updates.

The post Splunk’s Latest Advisory: Addressing Multiple Vulnerabilities in Splunk Enterprise appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Security and privacy settings in MapMyRun | Kaspersky official blog

We’ve previously explained why it’s essential to configure privacy settings before using training trackers — both on your phone in general and within the app itself. Doing so minimizes the risk of exposing your personal data, including your location, to the public. You wouldn’t want just anyone to be able to follow your runs and know exactly where and when to find you offline, would you?

You can check out our already published guides on configuring smartphones and the popular running apps Strava and Nike Run Club. Today, we’re focusing on privacy settings in MapMyRun.

MapMyRun (available for Android and iOS) has a rather interesting history. In September 2024, it was acquired as part of the MapMyFitness suite of apps by the media company Outside (led by CEO Robin Thurston) from the American sportswear manufacturer Under Armour. And Under Armour, in turn, had acquired this suite for $150 million back in 2013 from… Robin Thurston, the very same person who founded MapMyFitness in 2007! So, after 11 years, Thurston regained the company he had founded 17 years earlier.

Setting up privacy in MapMyRun

Unlike many apps, you won’t find the privacy settings under the usual cog icon in the top right corner of the main screen – that’s for workout settings. Instead, tap the three dots in the bottom right corner for iOS, or the three-line “burger” menu in the top left corner for Android, then select Settings (not Privacy Center — that’s something else). On the next screen, choose Privacy.

Where to find privacy settings in MapMyRun: ••• → Settings → Privacy

What should you configure here? First, under Profile Sharing, make sure it’s set to My Friends or, even better, Only me. It’s also a good idea to toggle off the switch next to Find me by email address so people can’t do just that.

Next, check Route Sharing and Workout Sharing and ensure they’re also set to My Friends or, preferably, Only me. Finally, go back to Settings, find Push Notifications, and disable any unnecessary notifications — or just turn them all off with the toggle at the top.

Configuring privacy in MapMyRun

If you decide to stop using MapMyRun, it’s a good idea to delete your account. To do this, navigate to SettingsPrivacy Center and choose Delete Account.

If you use other fitness apps to track your workouts, you can set their privacy settings using our guides:

Strava
Nike Run Club
adidas Running (formerly Runtastic) – still to come
ASICS Runkeeper (ditto)

You can also learn how to configure privacy in other apps — from social networks to browsers — on our website Privacy Checker.

And Kaspersky Premium will maximize your privacy protection and shield you from digital identity theft on all your devices.

Don’t forget to subscribe to our blog to stay ahead of scammers with more guides and helpful articles.

Kaspersky official blog – ​Read More

Weekly Industrial Control System (ICS) Intelligence Report: 54 New Vulnerabilities in Siemens, Rockwell Automation, and Delta Products

Overview

Cyble Research & Intelligence Labs (CRIL) has released its latest Weekly Industrial Control System (ICS) Vulnerability Intelligence Report, sharing multiple vulnerabilities observed by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) between October 8 and October 14, 2024. This week’s analysis focuses on security advisories and vulnerabilities that affect critical industrial infrastructure.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has published 21 security advisories specifically targeting Industrial Control Systems (ICS). These advisories encompass a total of 54 distinct vulnerabilities affecting major vendors, including Siemens, Rockwell Automation, Schneider Electric, and Delta Electronics. Among these, Siemens has reported the highest number of vulnerabilities, totaling 34, while Rockwell Automation follows with 13. 

The report particularly emphasizes vulnerabilities within Siemens’ Tecnomatix Plant Simulation software, which has implications for energy sector applications. A total of 14 vulnerabilities have been identified within this software, with most receiving a high CVSS3 score of 7.8. If exploited, these vulnerabilities could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or trigger a denial of service, posing a serious threat to operational integrity.

Among the most concerning findings is an Improper Authentication vulnerability linked to Siemens’ SENTRON 7KM PAC3200 (CVE-2024-41798). This power monitoring device, which measures and displays electrical parameters, is susceptible to attacks that exploit its Modbus TCP interface. Attackers can bypass authentication protections through brute-force methods or by monitoring cleartext communications. The advisory from Siemens indicates that “currently no fix is planned,” urging users to ensure that affected devices operate in secure environments to mitigate potential risks.

Vulnerabilities Details

The recent analysis by Cyble Research & Intelligence Labs (CRIL) provides a comprehensive overview of key vulnerabilities that organizations should prioritize for effective patch management and mitigation efforts. Notably, several vulnerabilities have been identified across various vendors, including Siemens, Rockwell Automation, and Delta Electronics.

One of the most intriguing vulnerabilities is CVE-2024-46886, associated with Siemens’ SIMATIC S7-1500 and S7-1200 CPUs, which pose an open redirect risk and are classified as medium severity. Another critical issue is CVE-2024-41981, found in multiple versions of Siemens’ Simcenter Nastran software, which is affected by a heap-based buffer overflow, designated as high severity. Similarly, CVE-2024-47046, also linked to Simcenter Nastran, involves improper memory buffer operations and carries a high severity rating.

Perhaps the most interesting vulnerability identified is CVE-2024-41798, related to Siemens’ SENTRON 7KM PAC3200. This issue involves improper authentication and is classified as critical, highlighting the potential for exploitation. Additionally, CVE-2024-47194, affecting Siemens’ ModelSim, reveals an uncontrolled search path element and is rated medium in severity. Another critical vulnerability, CVE-2024-47553, relates to the SINEC Security Monitor from Siemens, which faces an argument injection risk.

On the Rockwell Automation side, CVE-2024-7952 highlights a serious concern in the DataMosaix Private Cloud, where sensitive information exposure is rated as high severity. Delta Electronics also reported CVE-2024-47962, which involves a stack-based buffer overflow in its CNCSoft-G2 software, classified as high severity as well.

An overview of the vulnerabilities indicates a pronounced prevalence of high-severity issues among the disclosed vulnerabilities. Furthermore, a closer examination of vulnerabilities disclosed by vendors shows that the majority stem from companies engaged in critical infrastructure sectors, particularly Siemens and Rockwell Automation.

Recommendations and Mitigations

Given the identified vulnerabilities and their potential impacts, Cyble offers some important recommendations for organizations to strengthen their cybersecurity posture:


Regularly monitor security advisories and alerts from vendors and authorities to remain aware of potential vulnerabilities.

Implement a risk-based vulnerability management strategy to minimize the risk of exploitation, complemented by a Zero-Trust security model.

Encourage threat intelligence analysts to assist in the patch management process by continuously tracking critical vulnerabilities.

Ensure that your patch management strategy encompasses inventory management, patch assessment, testing, deployment, and verification. Automate these processes where feasible to enhance consistency and efficiency.

Effective network segmentation can limit attackers’ ability to perform reconnaissance and lateral movement within critical environments.

Periodically perform audits, vulnerability assessments, and penetration testing to identify and rectify security weaknesses.

Establish ongoing monitoring and logging capabilities to detect network anomalies and potential threats early.

Leverage SBOM to gain visibility into the individual components and libraries in use, along with their associated vulnerabilities.

Implement physical controls to restrict unauthorized personnel from accessing critical devices and networks.

Develop and regularly update an incident response plan that outlines procedures for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security incidents.

Conclusion

Addressing the vulnerabilities highlighted in the report requires a collaborative approach. Organizations should not only implement internal security measures but also engage with vendors and industry peers to share information and best practices. By adhering to the recommendations outlined above, organizations can better protect their assets and ensure the integrity of their critical infrastructure operations to remain ahead of online vulnerabilities and security trends.

The post Weekly Industrial Control System (ICS) Intelligence Report: 54 New Vulnerabilities in Siemens, Rockwell Automation, and Delta Products appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Malware Analysis Report in One Click

Editor’s note: The current article was originally published on August 16, 2022, and updated on October 21, 2024.

Malware analysis is a challenge as it is. But after your hard work on cracking a new sample, it is important to present all your results to the company and colleagues. And today, we will talk about how to write a malware analysis report in one click. 

How to write a malware analysis report?

To write a typical malware analysis report, you should cover the following points:

Summary. Provide the highlights of your research with the malicious program’s name, origin, and main characteristics.  

General information. Include malware type, file’s name, size, and current antivirus detection capabilities. Don’t forget about hashes: MD5, SHA1, SHA256, and SSDEEP. And if a sample has different family names, it’s worth mentioning them, too. 

Characteristics. Write how the sample infects a system, self-preserves, distributes, communicates with servers, collects data, etc. 

Dependencies. Note malware functionality with the required OS version, software set, executables and initialization files, DLLs, list of URLs, and scripts.

Behavior activities. Give a review of the behavior activities like what executable files malware drops, if it checks the language, runs injected code in another process, or changes any settings.

Static information. Code analysis results, headers information.

Additional data. Attach screenshots, logs, string lines excerpts, etc. 

IOCs. Show indicators of compromise that are necessary for successful detection and future prevention.

Get an automated malware analysis report with ANY.RUN 

It’s essential to save and share your reports for further cybersecurity strategy and investigation. And ANY.RUN sandbox allows you to do it effortlessly and with just one click. 

You can download text reports with detailed information, get PCAP and SSL keys, check request/response content, copy malware config information from the memory dump, use the process graph and MITRE ATT&CK matrix. Besides that, you can export data in JSON format.

We took the RedLine malware sample to show all report examples. 

1. Text reports

Our HTML report is a one-click option to get all data about a sample. It’s a ready-made solution, so you don’t need to write a malware report by yourself. Information is displayed conveniently, so you can easily find whatever you need. 

You can also adjust the document online, share and print it. Also, get the report via API. 

The text report includes all data from the task: 

created processes

events and files in the registry

information about network activity

IOCs

screenshots 

process behavior graph

Depending on your goal, you can customize an HTML report and choose what sections to include. 

Text malware report

2. JSON reports

Download a summary of all task information in JSON format. You can parse the maximum information with this file and analyze precisely the data you need. Then include it in the final report to show all malware footprints.

JSON summary

Easily generate detailed malware reports in ANY.RUN 



Register for free


3. STIX reports

ANY.RUN lets you export collected threat data in the Structured Threat Information eXpression (STIX) format. It is a standardized language used to transfer cyber threat intelligence in a consistent and machine-readable format.

The provided report contains a variety of data related to the threat analysis, including the link to the sandbox session, hashes, network traffic details, file system modifications, TTPs, and more.

Click Export → STIX to download threat data

To export data in STIX:

Run your analysis in the ANY.RUN sandbox or open any report from Public submissions.

Click Export.

Choose STIX from the list of options.

These reports can be ingested by Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems and other automated tools, enabling faster and more efficient threat detection and response.

Using STIX reports, your analysts and incident response teams can share threat data across different platforms in a more convenient way.

4. PCAP and SSL keys

One of ANY.RUN features is to intercept network traffic. SSL Keys and network dump in a PCAP format are available for your report and further analysis. Just download it from the task and include it in your final report.

PCAP and SSL keys

5. Request/response content

Take a look at the content from HTTP/HTTPS requests and responses. Besides, connection streams are also available. You can also investigate the header’s query. And this data should be highlighted in the report. 

Request/response content

6. Malware configuration 

ANY.RUN extracts the content of the malicious process’s memory dump, so you can dive into analysis with malware configuration: encrypted strings, IP addresses, ports that communicate with the C2 server, family name, version, mutex, and other data.  

Malware configuration

7. Process graph 

One of the most effective ways to get a summary of malicious execution is to use a process graph of behavior activities. All processes are presented clearly and logically, especially if the process tree is large. The graph gives you a new angle to look at the processes’ relations and maybe discover something new.  Also, it helps to point out the conclusion about the program’s behavior quickly. 

Process graph

8. MITRE ATT&CK matrix

Research sample’s tactics and techniques. In ANY.RUN, you can analyze malware functionality with the MITRE ATT&CK matrix.

MITRE ATT&CK matrix

Check how to get free malware samples and reports from ANY.RUN’s 6 million database. It will help to see other versions of malware samples and provide a more profound investigation for your research.

9. AI reports 

AI reports are highly useful when you need a detailed, easy-to-understand perspective on the threat at hand. These reports detail what occurred during the interactive session and highlight traits that may indicate malicious activity, explaining the rationale behind such assessments.

AI report

To generate a comprehensive report on any specific event registered during the malware’s execution, click the AI icon next to it. 

Wrapping up 

Check how to get free malware samples and reports from ANY.RUN’s 6 million database. It will help to see other versions of malware samples and provide a more profound investigation for your research. 

About ANY.RUN

 ANY.RUN is a cloud malware sandbox that handles the heavy lifting of malware analysis for SOC and DFIR teams. Every day, 300,000 professionals use our platform to investigate incidents and streamline threat analysis.      

Request a demo today and enjoy 14 days of free access to our Enterprise plan.     

Request demo →  

The post Malware Analysis Report in One Click appeared first on ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog.

ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog – ​Read More

Threat actors exploiting zero-days faster than ever – Week in security with Tony Anscombe

The average time it takes attackers to weaponize a vulnerability, either before or after a patch is released, shrank from 63 days in 2018-2019 to just five days last year

WeLiveSecurity – ​Read More