As we wrap up 2024, we’re excited to share the final release notes of the year, and they’re packed with updates you’re going to love! 

This December, we’ve shared some great news with our ANY.RUN community. From new wildcards and search operators in TI Lookup to the launch of our MISP instance and an upgraded Teamwork feature, we’ve been working to make your workflows smoother and more collaborative.  

And of course, we’ve expanded our threat coverage to ensure you’re ready to tackle whatever comes next.  

Let’s dive in! 

New Wildcards and Search Operators in ANY.RUN’s TI Lookup 

Searching through massive amounts of cyber threat data isn’t exactly fun. It can be frustrating when small variations in domain names or IP addresses make it hard to connect the dots. That’s why we’ve updated Threat Intelligence Lookup (TI Lookup) with new wildcards and search operators to give you more control and flexibility when crafting queries. 

Before this update, TI Lookup allowed you to use the basic operators AND along the wildcard *, which work great for flexible searches.  

In December, we’ve expanded this functionality by adding new wildcards and operators to make threat intelligence even more versatile. 

What’s new? 

• OR: The OR operator broadens your search by including results where at least one of the specified conditions is met.  

• NOT: The NOT operator excludes results matching specific conditions, narrowing your search to focus on relevant entries. 
• Parentheses (): They group conditions to ensure your query processes operators in the correct order, enabling precise, complex searches. 
• Question mark (?): Acts as a placeholder for a single character or none, making it perfect for handling variable strings. 
• Dollar sign ($): Ensures your search term appears at the end of a string, useful for pinpointing entries with specific endings. 
• Caret (^): Makes sure your search term appears at the beginning of a string, ideal for narrowing searches to items starting with specific patterns. 

For more details, check out the guide to using wildcards and operators. 

MISP Integration: A New Option for Threat Intelligence Sharing 

We’re excited to share that in December, we introduced our own MISP instance, providing access to Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) from ANY.RUN’s Threat Intelligence Feeds. This new feature brings even greater collaboration and efficiency to threat intelligence sharing. 

MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) is a free, open-source tool that streamlines the sharing of threat intelligence, enabling organizations to exchange data, identify compromises, and automate correlations. 

With ANY.RUN’s MISP instance, you can: 

• Access TI Feeds: Get real-time streams of malicious IPs, URLs, domains, ports, file names, and hashes from ANY.RUN’s Interactive Sandbox. The IOCs are pulled from different sources, including network activities and malware configurations. 
• Integrate with security tools: Connect ANY.RUN’s MISP instance to your SIEM, XDR, or other tools via API. 
• Improve threat detection: Enrich your IOCs with ANY.RUN’s data for a clearer understanding of threats. 
• Generate IDS rules: Export attributes in NIDS-compatible formats for use in IDS/IPS or NGFW systems. 

You can test ANY.RUN’s MISP and STIX feeds by getting a free demo sample or contacting us. 

New Teamwork Feature: Multiple Admin Support  

We’re excited to announce a powerful December update to ANY.RUN’s Teamwork feature, designed to simplify team management and improve collaboration for organizations of all sizes. 

Team owners can now assign admin roles to team members, with no limits on the number of admins.  

Admins have the following capabilities: 

• Enable or disable Single Sign-On (SSO) for the team. 
• Invite or remove team members as needed. 
• Manage licenses for team members, including access to features like TI Lookup. 

Besides, admins can assign or revoke admin rights, ensuring flexible and efficient management. 

This update was driven by feedback from our customers, who needed a way to share responsibilities within their teams. Here’s how it can help: 

• Delegation: If a team owner is unavailable (e.g., on vacation), responsibilities can easily be handed over to admins. 
• Time zone flexibility: Large teams operating in different time zones can now have admins based in various regions, improving responsiveness and workflow efficiency. 

How to start using this feature  

Team owners can assign admin roles in the Teamwork section under Licenses. Once set up, admins can immediately start managing the team and sharing responsibilities. 

Threat Coverage Updates

In December, we expanded our detection capabilities, adding 58 new malware signatures, introducing advanced YARA rules, and further improving our machine learning (ML) models to keep up with evolving threats. 

Signatures 

We’ve introduced 58 new signatures targeting a diverse range of malware families. Here are some of them: 

• Omani  
• Kunwoo  
• Ludbaruma  
• Trik  
• Sainbox  
• Expiro  
• Trickbot 
• Vidar 
• Lumma 
• Sonic 
• Pinegrove 
• Dusttrap 

APT Detection Updates 

We’ve enhanced our detection capabilities for several known APT attacks: 

• SimpleHelp, BugSleep, and PortStarter are now comprehensively monitored. 

New YARA Rules 

5 new YARA rules were added this month for more precise detection: 

• Fog Ransom  
• ArechClient2  
• Dusttrap  
• CVE-2024-38213 
• Umbral 

Suricata Rule Updates 

This month, we’ve significantly expanded our Suricata rule collection by adding 5,159 new rules, enhancing our detection accuracy across a variety of threats.  

These updates include focused detections for phishing kits, such as: 

• Gabagool  
• WikiKit  
• LogoKit  

Automated Interactivity Enhancements 

We’ve fine-tuned our automated interactivity clicker, making it smarter. These updates mean it’s now even better at interacting with malware samples, accurately simulating how real users might behave. 

With these improvements, detecting complex threats just got easier. We made sure you get even more reliable results for your investigations. 

About ANY.RUN  

ANY.RUN is a leading provider of a cloud-based malware analysis sandbox for effective threat hunting. Our service lets users safely and quickly analyze malware without the need for on-premises infrastructure. ANY.RUN is used by organizations of all sizes, including Fortune 500 companies, government agencies, and educational institutions.

With ANY.RUN you can: 

• Detect malware in seconds
• Interact with samples in real time
• Save time and money on sandbox setup and maintenance
• Record and study all aspects of malware behavior
• Collaborate with your team 
• Scale as you need

Get a 14-day free trial of ANY.RUN’s Interactive Sandbox →

The post Release Notes: New Search Operators in TI Lookup, MISP Integration, Multi-admin Support  appeared first on ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog.

ANY.RUN’s Cybersecurity Blog – ​Read More

Overview

Cyberattacks on a country’s critical infrastructure have become a growing malicious trend globally. The surge in cybercrime threats and its growing impact on national security, businesses, and individuals has led experts to closely examine which regions face the most cyberattacks.  

A recent study from the World Cybercrime Index (WCI) compiled by an international team of researchers, shed light on the most targeted countries, ranking them based on the severity of cyberattacks, the skill of the perpetrators, and the professionalism of the cybercriminals involved. 

As of 2024, these countries face the highest levels of cybercrime threats, driven by a complex mix of geopolitical factors, technological infrastructure, and economic conditions. This blog explores the top 10 countries that are most impacted by cyberattacks and why they are at the forefront of the global cybersecurity challenge. 

10. India: A Victim of Cybercrime Amid Rapid Digitalization 

India ranks tenth in the global cybercrime index, experiencing an uptick in cyberattacks due to its rapid digital transformation. The country’s massive online population and growing e-commerce sector make it an appealing target for cybercriminals. Phishing scams, financial fraud, and ransomware attacks are common in India, with both individuals and organizations being affected. The Indian government has been working to bolster cybersecurity, but the increasing maliciousness of cybercriminals presents an ongoing challenge for the country. 

Read also: https://cyble.com/resources/research-reports/india-threat-landscape-report-2024/ 

9. Brazil: A Growing Cybercrime Hotspot in Latin America 

Brazil, the largest economy in Latin America, has witnessed a surge in cyberattacks, particularly those targeting its financial sector and government institutions. Brazil’s growing digital economy has made it an attractive target for cybercriminals involved in fraud, data breaches, and ransomware. The WCI places Brazil ninth, citing its vulnerability to cybercrime despite efforts to improve cybersecurity regulations. Cybercriminal groups operating in Brazil often specialize in online fraud, identity theft, and other forms of financial cybercrime. 

Read also: https://cyble.com/blog/goatrat-android-banking-trojan-variant-targeting-brazilian-banks/ 

8. United Kingdom: A Rising Cyberattack Target 

The United Kingdom faces major cybersecurity threats, ranking eighth on the WCI. As a major financial and technological hub, the UK is often targeted by both cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors. Ransomware attacks and data breaches have been particularly impactful, with high-profile incidents affecting public and private sector organizations. The UK government has increased its efforts to combat cybercrime, but the country remains a target due to its global standing and the increasing digitization of its economy. 

7. North Korea: Cyber Warfare and Financial Theft 

North Korea’s cybercriminal activities are well-documented, with the country’s state-sponsored hackers playing a prominent role in cyberwarfare and financial cybercrime. The regime has been linked to several high-profile cyberattacks, including the infamous WannaCry ransomware attack and attacks on South Korean entities.  

North Korea’s cyber units, such as Lazarus Group, are involved in stealing funds through cybercrime to finance the country’s regime. Their targets are often financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, and government agencies, making North Korea a critical player in the global cybercrime arena. 

6. Romania: A Hotbed for Cybercrime Groups 

Romania is a big player in the global cybercrime ecosystem, ranking sixth on the WCI. The country is home to several notorious cybercriminal groups involved in ransomware attacks, data theft, and financial fraud.  

Romanian hackers are known for their technical expertise and ability to deploy malware across multiple sectors. The Romanian government has made efforts to crack down on cybercrime, but the country remains a hotbed for cyberattacks on countries worldwide, particularly targeting financial institutions and online businesses. 

Read also: https://cyble.com/blog/romania-urges-energy-sector-of-proactive-scanning-amid-lynx-ransomware-threat/ 

5. Nigeria: A Leading Hub for Cybercrime in Africa 

Nigeria has earned a place on the list of the top cyberattack countries due to its increasing involvement in online fraud, scams, and cybercrimes. Known for its widespread involvement in “419” fraud (advance-fee fraud) and cyber scams targeting both individuals and corporations globally, Nigeria’s cybercriminal activities are a growing concern. The country is also home to highly organized cybercrime groups, some of which use cybersecurity tools to launch phishing campaigns and steal sensitive data. The lack of sufficient cybersecurity infrastructure and regulatory enforcement contributes to the persistent cybercrime problem in Nigeria. 

4. United States: A Prime Target and Source of Cyberattacks 

The United States is not only a major source of cyberattacks but also one of the most heavily targeted nations globally. As the world’s largest economy and a hub for technological innovation, the U.S. faces an array of cyberthreats, from cybercriminals seeking financial gain to nation-state actors pursuing espionage objectives. 

The U.S. has witnessed high-profile cyberattacks, including those targeting critical infrastructure, government agencies, and multinational corporations. Ransomware attacks, data breaches, and election interference campaigns are just a few examples of the cybercrimes affecting the U.S., positioning it as one of the countries most impacted by cyberattacks. 

Read also: https://cyble.com/resources/research-reports/us-threat-landscape-report-a-time-of-growing-peril/ 

3. China: A Major Player in Cyber Espionage 

China ranks third in the global cybercrime rankings, largely due to its involvement in large-scale cyber espionage operations. The country has been accused of conducting numerous cyberattacks aimed at stealing intellectual property and accessing sensitive government and corporate data across the globe. 

Chinese cybercriminals are notorious for their high level of technical skill and have been linked to various attack methods, including Advanced Persistent Threats (APT). China’s rapid technological growth and its economic prominence have made it both a source and a victim of cyberattacks, making it one of the top cyberattack countries. 

2. Ukraine: A Geopolitical Hotspot for Cyberattacks 

Ukraine is another country that faces immense cybercrime threats. Since the 2014 annexation of Crimea, Ukraine has been subject to numerous state-sponsored cyberattacks, primarily from Russia. The country has been the target of ransomware attacks and power grid disruptions, making it a prominent example of cyberwarfare in the 21st century. 

The WCI ranks Ukraine second due to its vulnerability to cyberattacks, especially amid ongoing political tensions and military conflicts with Russia. Ukrainian government agencies, critical infrastructure, and businesses have been the focus of cyber attackers.  

Read also: Hackers Target Ukrainian Army with Fake Military Apps to Siphon Authentication and GPS Data 

1. Russia: The Epicenter of Cybercrime 

Russia remains the undisputed leader in terms of cybercriminal activity. Ranked number one on the World Cybercrime Index, Russia has been a hub for various cybercrime types, including state-sponsored attacks, ransomware campaigns, and hacking for espionage purposes.  

The country’s role in cyberattacks on countries globally, particularly targeting political opponents, is well-documented.  

Read also: Russian State Hackers Biggest Cyber Threat to US, UK and EU Elections 

The troubling nature of cybercriminal operations in Russia, coupled with their expertise in developing malware, makes the nation a constant threat to others. 

Conclusion: The Global Fight Against Cybercrime 

As we move into 2025, cyberattacks on countries are increasingly impacting vital sectors like government, finance, and healthcare. Countries such as Russia, Ukraine, China, and the United States are at the forefront of this growing global issue. To combat these threats, governments, organizations, and cybersecurity experts must collaborate to strengthen defenses and proactively monitor cybercriminal activities.  

Cyble, a leader in AI-powered cybersecurity, is playing an important role in this effort. Cyble offers multiple threat intelligence platforms that offer real-time monitoring, which processes vast amounts of dark web data and provides actionable insights. By leveraging AI-driven platforms like Cyble, organizations and government sectors can protect their infrastructure and respond to cyberattacks more effectively, helping to ensure a more secure future. 

References 

• https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2024-04-10-world-first-cybercrime-index-ranks-countries-cybercrime-threat-level 

• https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297312 

The post Russia, Ukraine, China, and More: The Nations at the Center of the Cybercrime Epidemic  appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Overview

The New Zealand’s Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB), through its National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), has implemented a series of measures to strengthen the country’s defenses against malicious cyber activity.

This follows a thorough review of practices concerning cyberattacks targeting members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), an organization committed to addressing the growing influence of China’s policies on global security and governance.

The review was initiated in May 2024 by Lisa Fong, the Deputy Director-General of Cyber Security at GCSB. Fong recognized a need for improvement after concerns arose over how the NCSC responded to a cyber incident involving IPAC members. These concerns were particularly focused on the NCSC’s handling of reports related to state-sponsored cyber activities and the broader implications of such incidents on national security.

IPAC members, who represent a coalition of lawmakers across various countries, were targeted in a large-scale cyberattack by APT31, a Chinese state-sponsored hacker group. The attack included over 1,000 emails sent to more than 400 IPAC-associated accounts, compromising the sensitive communications of numerous politicians. Despite the seriousness of the attack, many victims were not informed of the breach by their respective governments, prompting an outcry from international lawmakers.

To address these concerns and strengthen the NCSC’s cybersecurity protocols, a thorough review of the NCSC’s procedures was carried out, culminating in a report published in July 2024. The review focused on the NCSC’s handling of the cyberattack, assessing both the technical response and the broader implications for security and intelligence management.

Key Findings and Recommendations

The review highlighted several areas where the NCSC could improve its procedures. While the NCSC did not identify any successful compromises of classified information, it did detect numerous phishing attempts targeting the parliamentary email addresses of IPAC members. The review’s key recommendations included the following:

1. Broader Consideration of Implications: The NCSC needed to expand its focus beyond the technical response to cyber incidents. It was recommended that the NCSC develop a more comprehensive approach, one that not only addresses immediate technical threats but also considers the wider geopolitical and societal impacts of cyberattacks.
2. Enhanced Engagement with Targeted Individuals: The review called for greater engagement with individuals who had been targeted by foreign state-sponsored actors. This recommendation emphasized the need for a more proactive communication strategy to ensure that those affected by cyber threats are informed in a timely manner.
3. Improved Briefing Procedures: The review also stressed the importance of enhancing the NCSC’s process for briefing the Minister Responsible for the GCSB and their office. Effective communication at all levels of government was seen as crucial for a coordinated and quick response to cyber threats.
4. Public Guidance for High-Profile Individuals: As part of the review’s fourth recommendation, the NCSC developed and published new guidance on its website for New Zealanders considered “high-profile individuals.” This initiative was designed to offer advice on how to protect against cyberattacks, particularly for those in sensitive roles who might be more likely to become targets.

NCSC’s Response and Implementation

Following the review, the NCSC wasted no time in implementing the recommended changes. Lisa Fong confirmed that all identified improvements had been quickly actioned. “I’m pleased to confirm that we have put in place measures to address all recommendations outlined in the initial review,” said Fong in a statement.

The NCSC took several steps to strengthen its internal processes. These included updating procedures to ensure better alignment with international best practices, particularly in managing incidents involving foreign state-sponsored cyber activity. New internal guidance and standards were also established for NCSC staff to ensure that similar concerns do not arise in the future.

Ms. Fong further explained that while these improvements completed the review’s immediate actions, the NCSC remained committed to continuously enhancing its cybersecurity practices. “We are committed to identifying opportunities for improvement in our practices and procedures and implementing these where we have the ability to do so,” she said.

International Reactions to the Attack

The attack on IPAC members was not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of state-sponsored cyber activities targeting global political figures and institutions. Following the attack, several countries with IPAC members took important steps to address the breach and secure their own digital infrastructures.

Canada was one of the countries most affected by the attack, with 18 parliamentarians targeted, including prominent figures such as Garnett Genuis MP and John McKay MP. In response, these members issued a joint statement demanding an explanation as to why they were not notified about the cyberattack sooner. Public debates, including a call for a privileged debate in the House of Commons, highlighted the urgency of addressing these security lapses.

In Belgium, lawmakers, including Representative Els van Hoof and former Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, were targeted. These individuals, along with others, rallied political leaders to pursue legal action, pushing for both a parliamentary inquiry and potential criminal proceedings against those responsible.

Meanwhile, in New Zealand, former IPAC co-chairs Simon O’Connor and Louisa Wall, along with other targeted figures such as academic Anne-Marie Brady, pressed the government to ensure that MPs would be informed of similar threats in the future. In response to these concerns, the GCSB initiated a public inquiry, promising to provide further assurances to the affected individuals.

Elsewhere, countries such as France, Germany, and Italy saw similar reactions from their political leaders, who demanded accountability from their respective security agencies and called for international sanctions against APT31. These coordinated international efforts reflect the growing recognition of the threat posed by foreign state-sponsored cyberattacks on democratic institutions.

Broader Cybersecurity Context

The NCSC’s actions come at a time of heightened global concern about the security of democratic institutions and their susceptibility to cyber threats. State-sponsored actors, particularly those associated with China, have increasingly targeted foreign governments, institutions, and political figures to advance geopolitical objectives. The focus on IPAC members is part of a larger trend of foreign interference in democratic processes through digital means, including espionage and disinformation campaigns.

To counter this growing threat, New Zealand’s NCSC has worked closely with international partners such as the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) in the United Kingdom and the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) in New Zealand. These agencies have exchanged information and best practices to strengthen cyber defenses against these cyber threats.

Moreover, the NCSC is actively collaborating with the IPAC to enhance global cybersecurity cooperation, ensuring that targeted individuals and organizations receive timely and accurate information about potential threats. This international collaboration is essential to developing a unified, effective approach to defending against state-sponsored cyberattacks.

Conclusion

The review and subsequent improvements undertaken by the NCSC represent a significant step in enhancing New Zealand’s cybersecurity posture, particularly concerning foreign state-sponsored cyber activity. By acting swiftly on the recommendations of the IPAC review, the NCSC has not only addressed specific concerns raised by the targeted individuals but also ensured that its processes and practices are better aligned with international standards for cybersecurity.

As cyber threats continue to evolve, New Zealand’s commitment to continuous improvement and proactive engagement with global partners like the GCSB, NCSC, and IPAC will be an important factor in protecting the nation’s cybersecurity infrastructure and the integrity of its political institutions. As Lisa Fong emphasized, this is not the end of the journey but a part of the ongoing effort to protect New Zealand from emerging cyber risks.

References:

• https://www.ncsc.govt.nz/news/ncsc-delivers-all-recommendations-following-ipac-review
• https://www.ncsc.govt.nz/news/response-to-ipac-incident
• https://www.ipac.global/news/lawmakers-respond-to-news-of-cyber-attack

The post NCSC Implements Key Improvements Following IPAC Review of Cyber Threats appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Overview

Cyble’s December 19 IT vulnerability report to clients highlighted nine vulnerabilities at high risk of attack, including five under active discussion on dark web forums.

Cyble vulnerability intelligence and dark web researchers also noted threat actor claims of zero-day vulnerabilities for sale affecting Palo Alto Networks devices and Chrome and Edge browsers.

In total, Cyble researchers examined 13 vulnerabilities and 8 dark web exploits to arrive at the list of vulnerabilities that security teams should prioritize for patching. At-risk products include Apache Struts, Qualcomm digital signal processors (DSPs), a WordPress plugin, a Bluetooth flaw affecting Ubuntu, and more.

The Week’s Top Vulnerabilities

CVE-2024-53677: This file upload logic vulnerability in the Apache Struts web application framework has been rated 9.5 severity by the Apache Software Foundation but is still undergoing NVD analysis. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to manipulate file upload parameters to enable path traversal and potentially upload a malicious file that could be used to perform remote code execution. Recently, researchers disclosed that threat actors are attempting to exploit the vulnerability using public proof-of-concept exploits to allow remote code execution, and exploitation has also been discussed on dark web forums. Cyble also published a separate blog on this vulnerability.

Cyble researchers noted that there are nearly 200,000 vulnerable Apache Struts instances exposed to the internet (image below):

CVE-2024-43047: This vulnerability affects Qualcomm’s Digital Signal Processor (DSP) service, which is utilized in many Android devices. It allows for privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution, posing significant risks to affected systems. Google Project Zero marked the vulnerability as actively exploited in October 2024 and received a fix on Android in November 2024. Researchers also observed that the Serbian government exploited Qualcomm zero-days, including CVE-2024-43047, to unlock and infect Android devices with a new spyware family named “NoviSpy.”

CVE-2024-11972: The CVE for this vulnerability has been reserved but has not yet been created. The flaw affects the Hunk Companion WordPress plugin, which is designed to enhance functionality and build visually appealing websites without extensive coding knowledge. The vulnerability allows attackers to perform unauthenticated plugin installation through unauthorized POST requests, enabling them to install and activate other plugins that may contain known vulnerabilities. According to researchers, attackers are exploiting the vulnerability to install outdated plugins with known flaws from the WordPress.org repository. This allows them to access vulnerabilities that can lead to remote code execution (RCE), SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), or the creation of backdoor admin accounts, posing significant risks to site security.

CVE-2023-45866: This medium-severity vulnerability affects Bluetooth HID Hosts in systems utilizing BlueZ, particularly in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS with the BlueZ 5.64-0ubuntu1 package. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated peripheral HID device to initiate an encrypted connection, potentially enabling the injection of Human Interface Device (HID) messages without user interaction.

Vulnerabilities and Exploits on Underground Forums

Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) researchers also identified the following exploits and vulnerabilities discussed on Telegram channels and cybercrime forums, raising the risk that they will be exploited in attacks.

CVE-2024-28059: This critical security vulnerability, which was identified in the MyQ Print Server in versions prior to 8.2 (patch 43), allows remote attackers to gain elevated privileges on the target server.

CVE-2024-38819: This high-severity path traversal vulnerability in the Spring Framework specifically affects applications that utilize WebMvc.fn or WebFlux.fn functional web frameworks.

CVE-2024-35250: This high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows operating system specifically affects the kernel-mode driver.

CVE-2024-40711: This critical vulnerability identified in Veeam Backup & Replication software allows for unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) due to deserialization of untrusted data.

CVE-2023-27997: This heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in certain FortiOS and FortiProxy versions may allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests, specifically affecting SSL VPNs.

Threat actors were also observed offering a zero-day exploit weaponizing a vulnerability claimed to be present on Palo Alto Network’s PAN-OS VPN-supported devices (asking price: $60,000) and a zero-day exploit weaponizing a vulnerability allegedly present in Chrome and Edge (asking price: $100,000).

Cyble Recommendations

To protect against these vulnerabilities and exploits, organizations should implement the following best practices:

• To mitigate vulnerabilities and protect against exploits, regularly update all software and hardware systems with the latest patches from official vendors.
• Develop a comprehensive patch management strategy that includes inventory management, patch assessment, testing, deployment, and verification. Automate the process where possible to ensure consistency and efficiency.
• Divide your network into distinct segments to isolate critical assets from less secure areas. Use firewalls, VLANs, and access controls to limit access and reduce the attack surface exposed to potential threats.
• Create and maintain an incident response plan that outlines procedures for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security incidents, including ransomware-resistant backups. Regularly test and update the plan to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with current threats.
• Implement comprehensive monitoring and logging solutions to detect and analyze suspicious activities. Use SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems to aggregate and correlate logs for real-time threat detection and response.
• Subscribe to security advisories and alerts from official vendors, CERTs, and other authoritative sources. Regularly review and assess the impact of these alerts on your systems and take appropriate actions.
• Conduct regular vulnerability assessment and penetration testing (VAPT) exercises to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in your systems. Complement these exercises with periodic security audits to ensure compliance with security policies and standards.

Conclusion

These vulnerabilities highlight the urgent need for security teams to prioritize patching exploitable vulnerabilities in sensitive products and vulnerabilities that could be weaponized as entry points for wider attacks. With increasing discussion of these exploits on dark web forums, organizations must stay vigilant and proactive.

Implementing strong security practices is essential for protecting sensitive data and maintaining system integrity. A comprehensive threat intelligence solution like Cyble can monitor for threats and leaks specific to your environment, allowing you to respond quickly to events and prevent them from becoming wider incidents.

The post IT Vulnerability Report: Cyble Urges Fixes for Apache Struts, Qualcomm & More appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More

Cybersecurity has long been an essential element of organizational defense, with the growing complexity and frequency of cyberattacks propelling the development of cybersecurity practices. Among these practices, Threat Intelligence (TI) has become a central element, helping organizations anticipate, understand, and counter various cyber threats. As we approach 2025, however, a new evolution in threat intelligence is emerging: Predictive Threat Intelligence (PTI).

While traditional Threat Intelligence (TI) focuses on collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on cyber threats after they occur, Predictive Threat Intelligence goes a step further. It uses advanced techniques, particularly AI (artificial intelligence) and machine learning (ML), to predict cyber threats before they materialize. This field holds great promise for proactively strengthening an organization’s cybersecurity posture by providing early warnings, reducing damage from potential attacks, and enabling defense strategies based on anticipatory insights.

What Is Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI), and how is it Different from Predictive Threat Intelligence (PTI)?

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is the practice of collecting, analyzing, and sharing data about cyber threats. By gaining insights into threat actors’ behavior and tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), organizations can better understand potential cyber threats, allowing them to prepare, respond, and mitigate potential attacks.

Traditional Threat Intelligence tends to focus on reactive measures, where security teams analyze attack patterns after a breach or threat occurs. In contrast, Predictive Threat Intelligence (PTI) takes a more proactive stance. By leveraging AI and ML, PTI not only understands current cyber threats but also forecasts future attacks before they materialize.

Machine learning algorithms analyze large datasets, including historical threat data and emerging patterns, to predict the types of threats organizations might face in the near future. For example, if an AI model detects a surge in phishing attacks against a particular industry, it can alert organizations in that sector to prepare for a potential escalation in attacks. This predictive capability allows organizations to take precautionary measures before a threat becomes imminent.

Predictive Threat Intelligence enhances the traditional threat intelligence model by offering actionable, anticipatory insights that enable proactive security measures, such as patching vulnerabilities or reinforcing defenses against specific attack vectors before they are widely exploited. This shift from reactive to proactive cybersecurity is positioned to transform the way organizations approach risk management and threat mitigation.

Why Is Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Important?

Understanding the importance of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) is important to appreciating its role in the cybersecurity ecosystem. As cyberattacks become increasingly damaging, the need for effective threat intelligence grows. Without comprehensive CTI, organizations would be left scrambling to respond to attacks, often too late to prevent significant damage.

CTI provides essential insights into cyber threats, including information about threat actors, their motives, and the vulnerabilities they exploit. With this knowledge, organizations can develop more rugged defense mechanisms and avoid becoming targets for specific types of attacks.

The most compelling reason for investing in CTI is its ability to elevate organizational security beyond reactive measures. By enabling organizations to recognize online threats early, CTI empowers security teams to adopt a proactive security posture. Proactive defense strategies allow vulnerabilities to be patched before they can be exploited and preparations to be made for impending threats, all of which contribute to reducing the overall risk of a breach.

How Does Predictive Threat Intelligence Work?

Predictive Threat Intelligence works by combining AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics to analyze vast amounts of historical and real-time threat data. By understanding the TTPs of cyber adversaries, these tools can identify patterns that signal emerging threats. Here’s how it works in practice:

1. Data Collection: Predictive threat intelligence platforms collect data from diverse sources, including the surface web, deep web, and dark web, as well as intelligence from private threat-sharing organizations and public cybersecurity resources. These datasets provide crucial insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors.
2. Data Processing and Analysis: AI models and machine learning algorithms process the collected data, identifying potential threats based on historical attack patterns and emerging trends. For instance, if a surge in phishing attacks targeting a specific industry is detected, AI models can recognize similar characteristics or tactics that might indicate future attacks.
3. Threat Forecasting: Predictive intelligence platforms then forecast potential threats based on identified trends. For example, AI can predict that a new form of ransomware is gaining traction among cybercriminals, alerting organizations to prepare for a possible attack.
4. Proactive Response: Once potential threats are identified, the predictive system provides actionable intelligence to help organizations bolster their defenses. These could include patching known vulnerabilities, updating defense strategies, and alerting stakeholders to prepare for specific attack scenarios.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Predictive Threat Intelligence

While Predictive Threat Intelligence (PTI) involves more than just AI, artificial intelligence and machine learning play a crucial role in its development. AI’s strength lies in its ability to analyze massive volumes of data, recognize patterns, and make predictions about future events, including cyberattacks.

However, despite the potential, AI and ML alone are not enough to guarantee a fully predictive threat intelligence model. Predictive intelligence is complex, and building reliable, actionable insights requires a balanced integration of human intelligence and automated systems.

The role of AI and machine learning in predictive intelligence includes:

• Threat Detection: AI can identify anomalous behavior in network traffic, suggesting potential attack attempts.
• Risk Analysis: By analyzing attack vectors and patterns, AI models can prioritize potential risks based on the severity of the threats and their likelihood of occurring.
• Automation: Machine learning models can automate certain security functions, such as scanning for vulnerabilities and patching security gaps, without the need for human intervention.

The Challenge of Implementing Predictive Threat Intelligence

While predictive threat intelligence is a highly promising approach, it faces several challenges, especially in terms of implementation.

1. Data Availability: One of the primary hurdles is the availability of quality data. AI and machine learning models require large, diverse datasets to learn and predict threats accurately. However, data is often fragmented and may not be available in a standardized format, making it difficult for predictive systems to integrate and analyze it effectively.
2. Complexity of Predictive Models: Predicting future threats is an inherently complex task. As with any prediction, there is a degree of uncertainty, and not every forecast will be accurate. The dynamic nature of cybersecurity means that there will always be a level of unpredictability when it comes to forecasting attacks.
3. Human Expertise: Although AI and machine learning are powerful tools, human expertise is still necessary to interpret the data and provide context. Human analysts play a critical role in identifying nuanced threats and validating AI predictions to ensure the intelligence is actionable.
4. Data Privacy and Sharing: Threat intelligence requires data from multiple sources, including potentially sensitive or confidential data. Therefore, sharing threat intelligence can raise privacy concerns, especially in industries like finance or healthcare. Developing systems that allow for safe and ethical sharing of threat data is essential for the success of PTI.

The Future of Predictive Threat Intelligence in 2025

As we look toward 2025, the role of Predictive Threat Intelligence (PTI) in cybersecurity will become increasingly important. By predicting threats before they materialize, PTI will enable organizations to stay one step ahead of cybercriminals, minimizing the risks of cyber threats.

In the near future, advancements in AI-powered threat intelligence will allow organizations to:

• Improve the automation of cybersecurity workflows, enabling faster, more accurate threat detection and mitigation.
• Enhance the integration of AI and human expertise, creating a more effective hybrid threat intelligence model.
• Develop better predictive models that consider a wider array of threat actors and attack vectors, leading to more accurate forecasts.
• Better share threat intelligence across industries, increasing collaboration and improving overall cybersecurity resilience.

Cyble, an industry leader in Cyber Threat Intelligence, has been at the forefront of this evolution. Cyble’s Cyber Threat Intelligence Platform provides real-time insights into potential threats, combining historical threat data with AI-driven analysis to deliver actionable, predictive intelligence. By integrating diverse data sources, Cyble enables organizations to identify potential threats, prioritize risks, and take proactive measures to mitigate potential breaches.

Why Choose Cyble?

Cyble offers a comprehensive cyber threat intelligence solution that empowers organizations to tackle cyber threats more effectively. With features like dark web monitoring, vulnerability management, and AI-driven analysis, Cyble helps companies not only detect threats but also predict and prevent them before they cause damage.

Cyble’s platform integrates seamlessly with your existing security infrastructure, enabling you to:

• Gather intelligence from various sources, including the deep and dark web, to identify emerging threats.
• Augment data with contextual insights for better decision-making.
• Receive timely notifications about potential threats and vulnerabilities, enabling proactive defense strategies.

Cyble is ready to help businesses understand and walk through this dynamic landscape and stay protected against cyber threats in 2025 and beyond.

Conclusion: Stay Ahead with Cyble

Predictive Threat Intelligence is the future of threat Intelligence. By leveraging advanced technologies like AI and machine learning, organizations can anticipate threats before they emerge, minimizing the damage caused by cyberattacks. As we move towards 2025, Predictive Threat Intelligence will be an essential tool in every cybersecurity strategy.

If you want to strengthen your organization’s defenses and stay protected from upcoming threats, Cyble’s threat intelligence platform is your go-to solution. Schedule a demo today and discover how Cyble can help you proactively secure your assets against the threats of tomorrow.

The post Predictive Threat Intelligence – Predictions for 2025: The Future of CTI appeared first on Cyble.

Blog – Cyble – ​Read More