Eufy’s new smart display gives Amazon and Google a run for their money – how it works

The Smart Display E10 tablet offers facial recognition, quad-view live stream, event summaries, and a built-in battery for portability.

Latest stories for ZDNET in Security – ​Read More

Critical Vulnerability Patched in Citrix NetScaler

Citrix has released patches for critical- and high-severity vulnerabilities in NetScaler and Secure Access Client and Workspace for Windows.

The post Critical Vulnerability Patched in Citrix NetScaler appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek – ​Read More

FedRAMP at Startup Speed: Lessons Learned

For organizations eyeing the federal market, FedRAMP can feel like a gated fortress. With strict compliance requirements and a notoriously long runway, many companies assume the path to authorization is reserved for the well-resourced enterprise. But that’s changing.
In this post, we break down how fast-moving startups can realistically achieve FedRAMP Moderate authorization without derailing

The Hacker News – ​Read More

WormGPT Makes a Comeback Using Jailbroken Grok and Mixtral Models

Cato CTRL uncovers new WormGPT variants on Telegram powered by jailbroken Grok and Mixtral. Learn how cybercriminals jailbreak top LLMs for uncensored, illegal activities in this latest threat research.

Hackread – Latest Cybersecurity, Hacking News, Tech, AI & Crypto – ​Read More

OpenAI to Help DoD With Cyber Defense Under New $200 Million Contract

OpenAI has been awarded a $200 million contract for AI capabilities to help the Defense Department address national security challenges.

The post OpenAI to Help DoD With Cyber Defense Under New $200 Million Contract appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek – ​Read More

Mitigating AI Threats: Bridging the Gap Between AI and Legacy Security

Adopting a layered defense strategy that includes human-centric tools and updating security components.

The post Mitigating AI Threats: Bridging the Gap Between AI and Legacy Security appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek – ​Read More

When legitimate tools go rogue

When legitimate tools go rogue

Late one Tuesday night, Elena’s phone buzzed with an alert from her company’s SIEM. Her team had set up a rule to flag when certain system tools — whoaminltest and nslookup—were run one after another in quick succession. That exact pattern had just triggered on a computer in the Finance Department. The time? 2:13 a.m.

Concerned, Elena logged in from home to investigate. Almost immediately, two more alerts appeared. One signaled that Mimikatz (a tool popular with threat actors to steal credentials) had been used on the same Finance machine. The other reported a PsExec download (a command line tool used to execute processes) on a domain controller.

Elena and her team began isolating systems and tracing the activity, determined to stop it before it spread any further. What first looked like routine system commands now clearly pointed to something more serious.

This story is a compartmentalized version of something we’re seeing more and more often in Cisco Talos Incident Response engagements: Rather than inventing their own tools, attackers are making use of familiar, legitimate software — just with a very different purpose. 

What exactly are LOLBins?

A big part of this trend revolves around “living off the land binaries,” or LOLBins. LOLBins are tools built into an operating system that attackers can use to carry out malicious actions without having to download or install any new software or utilities.

They’re especially concerning because they’re already installed, trusted, and frequently used for normal IT tasks, making them difficult to detect or block without disrupting operations.

Defenders can reference the “Living Off The Land Binaries, Scripts and Libraries” or LOLBAS project, which maintains a list of known LOLBins on GitHub.

But it’s not just LOLBins…

LOLBins were used often across Talos IR engagements in 2024, but we actually saw a wider variety of commercial and open-source tools used as well. Threat actors likely gravitate towards these because they can choose which tools best suit their needs best (or which commercial tools will blend into the victim environment). 

When legitimate tools go rogue

Take DonPAPI, for example. This is an open-source tool observed in several recent Talos IR engagements that automates credential dumping remotely on multiple Windows computers. It locates and retrieves Windows Data Protection API (DPAPI) protected credentials, a process also known as “DPAPI dumping.” DonPAPI searches for certain files, including Wi-Fi keys, RDP passwords and credentials saved in web browsers, to help authenticate and move laterally to identify other assets in the environment.

From an identity perspective, open-source tools like DonPAPI pose a significant risk to organizations based on their wide availability on code repositories like GitHub and their ease of installation. 

Legit tool, suspicious intent

Here’s how this plays out in the field, using the top three examples of most used tools as observed in Cisco Talos’ 2024 Year in Review:

When legitimate tools go rogue

These tools weren’t built for attackers, but they’ve become some of the most common ingredients in ransomware and advanced persistent threat (APT) campaigns.

In a recent episode of The Talos Threat Perspective, one of our senior Talos IR consultants spoke about tools that were created for legitimate purposes (e.g., HRSword, REMCOS RAT and Cobalt Strike), but played a large part in the ransomware engagements investigated by Talos IR in 2025.

Remote Access Management tools

Lately, Talos has seen an increase in the use of remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools during attacks — the same kind of software IT teams and managed service providers rely on to access systems remotely. These tools are designed for legitimate use, but in the wrong hands, they become a stealthy way to maintain persistence on compromised systems without raising alarms.

One colleague shared a story that stuck with me: In some incidents, the attackers showed up with an entire toolkit of RMM software, testing each one to see which would slip through unnoticed (or not get blocked). Often, they’d use exactly the same tools already trusted by the target or their service provider, such as ScreenConnect or AnyDesk.

It’s like they arrived at the front door with a ring full of keys, trying each one until something clicked. And when the tool they use is something the environment already knows — already trusts — the question becomes: how do you spot the intruder when they’re using your own keys?

How do you detect something that looks normal?

Let’s go back to Elena. Her team stopped the attack not just because of the alert, but because they knew what should be running on that workstation. They had clear asset inventories and network behavior baselines, and they conducted continuous anomaly monitoring.

That’s really the heart of what works best when it comes to detecting these types of attacks:

  • Asset management: Know what’s installed and where. Know who owns what assets and what high-privileged accounts are for.
  • Behavioral baselining: Understand what “normal” looks like.
  • Continuous monitoring: Configure detections to catch known TTPs and subtle deviations from baselines.
  • Threat intel alignment: Use current trends like the DonPAPI surge to inform what you log and watch for. Talos’ blog and IR reports are great resources to keep up with industry trends.

Bottom line

Whether it’s PsExec, DonPAPI or TeamViewer, attackers are increasingly hiding in plain sight, using the same tools IT and security teams rely on for daily operations.

Detecting malicious use of legitimate tools isn’t just about recognizing what’s running. It’s about asking why it’s running.

Sometimes, the only difference between a routine operation and a breach is the analyst who stopped to ask: “Why was that tool running at 2:13 a.m.?”

Cisco Talos Blog – ​Read More

Chrome 137 Update Patches High-Severity Vulnerabilities

Google has released a Chrome 137 update to resolve two memory bugs in the browser’s V8 and Profiler components.

The post Chrome 137 Update Patches High-Severity Vulnerabilities appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek – ​Read More

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT

  • In May 2025, Cisco Talos identified a Python-based remote access trojan (RAT) we call “PylangGhost,” used exclusively by a North Korean-aligned threat actor. PylangGhost is functionally similar to the previously documented GolangGhost RAT, sharing many of the same capabilities. 
  • In recent campaigns, the threat actor Famous Chollima — potentially made up of multiple groups — has been using a Python-based version of their trojan to target Windows systems, while continuing to deploy a Golang-based version for MacOS users. Linux users are not targeted in these latest campaigns. 
  • The attacks are targeting employees with experience in cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. 
  • Based on open-source intelligence, only a small number of users, predominantly in India, are affected. Cisco product telemetry does not indicate that there are any affected Cisco users. 

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT

Since mid-2024, the threat actor group Famous Chollima (aka Wagemole), a North Korean-aligned threat actor, has been very active through several well-documented campaigns. These campaigns include using variants of Contagious Interview (aka DeceptiveDevelopment) and creating fake job advertisements and skill-testing pages. In the latter, users are instructed to copy and paste (ClickFix) a malicious command line in order to install drivers necessary to conduct the final skill-testing stage.  

Toward the end of the year, researchers documented Famous Chollima’s remote access trojan (RAT) called “GolangGhost” in its source code format, which was frequently used as the final payload in the threat actor’s ClickFix campaigns. 

In May 2025, Cisco Talos discovered threat actors starting to deploy a functionally equivalent Python variant of GolangGhost trojan, which we call “PylangGhost.” 

Fake job interview sites mislead users to PylangGhost infection 

Famous Chollima seek financial benefit using a two-pronged approach: first, by creating fake employers for the purpose of jobseekers exposing their personal information, and second by deploying fake employees as workers in targeted victim companies.  

This blog focuses on the first method, where real software engineers, marketing employees, designers and other workers are targeted by fake recruiters and instructed to visit skill-testing pages in order to move forward with their application. 

Based on the advertised positions, it is clear that the Famous Chollima is broadly targeting individuals with previous experience in cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. The skill-testing sites attempt to impersonate real companies such as Coinbase, Archblock, Robinhood, Parallel Studios, Uniswap and others, which helps with the targeting.  

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 1. Examples of initial fake job sites.

Each target is sent an invite code to visit a testing website where, depending on the position, they are instructed to enter their details and answer several questions to test their experience and skills. The sites are created using the React framework and have very similar visual designs, no matter the type of position.  

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 2. Example of questions asked for an illegitimate Business Development Manager position at Robinhood.

Once the user answers all the questions and provides personal details, the site displays an invitation to record a video for the interviewer, recommending that the user request camera access by pressing a button. 

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 3. A camera setup page displayed once questions are answered.

Finally, when the user requests camera, the site displays the instructions for the user to copy, paste and execute a command to allegedly install the required video drivers, if the OS is supported. When Talos used Windows and MacOS test systems, the instructions were shown as seen in Figure 4 and 5. The Linux test system led to another error message, without any instructions to download and install the payload.  

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 4. Windows instructions to copy, paste and execute a malicious command. 
Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 5. MacOS instructions to copy, paste and execute a malicious command. 

Instructions for downloading the alleged fix are different based on the browser fingerprinting, and also given in appropriate shell language for the OS: PowerShell or Command Shell for Windows, and Bash for MacOS.

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 6. Command Shell, PowerShell or Bash instructions to download a payload.

PylangGhost – Python variant of GolangGhost 

As the Golang variant of the RAT is already well-documented, this blog focuses on the Python version and the similarities between the two. The initial stage consists of a command line which the fake webpage tells the unsuspecting user to copy, paste and execute. 

The command line uses either PowerShell Invoke-Webrequest or curl to download a ZIP file containing the PylangGhost modules as well as Visual Basic Script file. This script is responsible for unzipping the Python library stored in the “lib.zip file” and launching the trojan by running a renamed Python interpreter using the file “nvidia.py” as the Python program to run. 

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 7. The first stage simply unzips a Python distribution library and launches the RAT. 

 PylangGhost consists of six well-structured Python modules. It is not clear to Talos why the threat actors decided to create two variants using a different programming language, or which was created first. Based on the comments in the code, it is unlikely that the threat actors used a large language model (LLM) to help rewrite the code for Python. One of the strings in the configuration module file (“config.py”) indicates that the Python version is 1.0, while the appropriate configuration variable in the Golang version indicates that the version is 2.0. However, Talos cannot definitively conclude that those two version numbers are comparable. 

 The execution starts with the file “nvidia.py”, which performs several tasks: It creates a registry value to launch the RAT every time user logs onto the system, generates a GUID for the system to be used in communication with command and control (C2) server, connects to the C2 server and enters the command loop for communication with the server.  

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT
Figure 8. ”nvidia.py” executes the main loop for communication with the C2 server

 The configuration file “config.py” specifies the commands that can be received from the server, which are identical to the commands previously documented in the Golang version of the RAT. These commands enable remote control the infected system and the theft of cookies and credentials from over 80 browser extensions, including password managers and cryptocurrency wallets, including Metamask, 1Password, NordPass, Phantom, Bitski, Initia, TronLink and MultiverseX. 

The command handling module, “command.py”, defines function handlers and handles the commands received from the C2 server.  

Command 

Functionality 

qwer 

COMMAND_INFORMATION – collect information about the infected system, username, OS version etc 

asdf 

COMMAND_FILE_UPLOAD – file upload 

zxcv 

COMMAND_FILE_DOWNLOAD – file download 

vbcx 

COMMAND_OS_SHELL – launch an OS shell for remote access and control of the infected system 

ghdj 

COMMAND_WAIT – sleep for a number of seconds specified by the C2 server 

r4ys 

COMMAND_AUTO – browser information stealing command 

89io 

AUTO_CHROME_GATHER_COMMAND – subcommand of the browser information stealer command 

gi%# 

AUTO_CHROME_COOKIE_COMMAND – subcommand of the browser information stealer command 

dghh 

COMMAND_EXIT 

Table 1. Commands and functionalities.

The module “auto.py” contains the functionality for stealing the stored browser credentials and session cookies, as well as collecting data from various browser extensions.  

“Api.py” is responsible for implementing the communications protocol with the C2 server, using RC4 encryption to encrypt packets over otherwise unencrypted HTTP used while communicating with the C2 server. The data in a HTTP packet is encrypted with RC4 algorithm, but the encryption key is also sent within the packet structure. The packet begins with 16 bytes of MD5 checksum for the rest of the packet, for verification of data integrity, followed by 128 bytes containing the RC4 encryption key, followed by an encrypted data blob.  

Finally, “util.py” handles the compression and decompression of files. 

Comparison of Python and Golang modules 

To assess the similarity between the two versions, Talos compares the names of the modules written in different languages as well as their functionality. The structure, the naming conventions and the function names are very similar, which indicates that the developers of the different versions either worked closely together or are the same person.   

Module 

Python name 

Golang name 

Main function module 

nvidia.py 

cloudfixer.go 

Configuration module 

config.py 

config/constans.go 

Main command loop 

nvidia.py 

core/loop.go 

Command handlers 

command.py 

core/loop.go 

Browser Stealer functionality 

auto.py 

auto/* modules 

File compression 

util.py 

util/compress.go 

Base64 message encoding 

command.py 

command/stackcmd.go 

Duplicate process check 

nvidia.py 

instance/check.go 

Communications protocol 

api.py 

transport/htxp.go 

Table 2. Comparison of Python and Golang RAT module names. 

Coverage  

Ways our customers can detect and block this threat are listed below.  

Famous Chollima deploying Python version of GolangGhost RAT

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here.  

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here.  

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Appliance and Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat.  

Cisco Secure Network/Cloud Analytics (Stealthwatch/Stealthwatch Cloud) analyzes network traffic automatically and alerts users of potentially unwanted activity on every connected device.  

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products.  

Cisco Secure Access is a modern cloud-delivered Security Service Edge (SSE) built on Zero Trust principles.  Secure Access provides seamless transparent and secure access to the internet, cloud services or private application no matter where your users work.  Please contact your Cisco account representative or authorized partner if you are interested in a free trial of Cisco Secure Access.  

Umbrella, Cisco’s secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network.   

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them.   

Additional protections with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from the Firewall Management Center.  

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network.   

Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org.  

ClamAV detections available for this threat:

Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045389-0
Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045388-0
Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045387-0
Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045386-0
Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045385-0
Win.Backdoor.PyChollima-10045384-0

IOCs 

The IOCs can also be found in our GitHub repository here.

SHA256 

a206ea9b415a0eafd731b4eec762a5b5e8df8d9007e93046029d83316989790a - auto.py  
c2137cd870de0af6662f56c97d27b86004f47b866ab27190a97bde7518a9ac1b - auto.py  
0d14960395a9d396d413c2160570116e835f8b3200033a0e4e150f5e50b68bec - api.py 
8ead05bb10e6ab0627fcb3dd5baa59cdaab79aa3522a38dad0b7f1bc0dada10a - api.py 
5273d68b3aef1f5ebf420b91d66a064e34c4d3495332fd492fecb7ef4b19624e - nvidia.py 
267009d555f59e9bf5d82be8a046427f04a16d15c63d9c7ecca749b11d8c8fc3 - nvidia.py 
7ac3ffb78ae1d2d9b5d3d336d2a2409bd8f2f15f5fb371a1337dd487bd471e32 - nvidia.py 
b7ab674c5ce421d9233577806343fc95602ba5385aa4624b42ebd3af6e97d3e5 - util.py 
fb5362c4540a3cbff8cb1c678c00cc39801dc38151edc4a953e66ade3e069225 - util.py 
d029be4142fca334af8fe0f5f467a0e0e1c89d3b881833ee53c1e804dc912cfd - command.py 
b8402db19371db55eebea08cf1c1af984c3786d03ff7eae954de98a5c1186cee - command.py 
1f482ce7e736a8541cc16e3e80c7890d13fb1f561ae38215a98a75dce1333cee - config.py 
ed170975e3fd03440360628f447110e016f176a44f951fcf6bc8cdb47fbd8e0e - config.py 
929c69827cd2b03e7b03f9a53c08268ab37c29ac4bd1b23425f66a62ad74a13b - config.py 
127406b838228c39b368faa9d6903e7e712105b5ad8f43a987a99f7b10c29780 - config.py 
0ec9d355f482a292990055a9074fdabdb75d72630b920a61bdf387f2826f5385 - update.vbs 
c2d2320ae43aaa0798cbcec163a0265cba511f8d42d90d45cd49a43fe1c40be6 - update.vbs 
e7c2b524f5cb0761a973accc9a4163294d678f5ce6aca73a94d4e106f4c8fea4 - nvidiaRelease.zip 
28198494f0ed5033085615a57573e3d748af19e4bd6ea215893ebeacf6e576df - vdriverWin.zip 
fc71a1df2bb4ac2a1cc3f306c3bdf0d754b9fab6d1ac78e4eceba5c6e7aee85d - nvidiaRelease.zip 
d3500266325555c9e777a4c585afc05dfd73b4cbe9dba741c5876593b78059fd - nvidiaRelease.zip 

C2 servers 

hxxp[://]31[.]57[.]243[.]29:8080 
hxxp[://]154[.]58[.]204[.]15:8080 
hxxp[://]212[.]81[.]47[.]217:8080 
hxxp[://] 31[.]57[.]243[.]190:8080

Download host names 

api[.]quickcamfix[.]online   
api[.]auto-fixer[.]online   
api[.]quickdriverupdate[.]online   
api[.]camtuneup[.]online   
api[.]driversofthub[.]online   
api[.]drive-release[.]cloud   
api[.]vcamfixer[.]online   
api[.]nvidia-drive[.]cloud   
api[.]nvidia-release[.]us   
api[.]autodriverfix[.]online   
api[.]camdriversupport[.]com   
api[.]smartdriverfix[.]cloud   
api[.]drivercams[.]cloud   
api[.]camtechdrivers[.]com   
api[.]web-cam[.]cloud   
api[.]camera-drive[.]org   
api[.]nvidia-release[.]org 
api[.]fixdiskpro[.]online 
api[.]autocamfixer[.]online

Fake job interview host names 

krakenhire[.]com  
yuga[.]skillquestions[.]com  
uniswap[.]speakure[.]com  
doodles[.]skillquestions[.]com  
www[.]hireviavideo[.]com  
kraken[.]livehiringpro[.]com  
quiz-nest[.]com  
www[.]smartvideohire[.]com  
www[.]talent-hiringstep[.]com  
provevidskillcheck[.]com  
skill[.]vidintermaster[.]com  
digitaltalent[.]review  
robinhood[.]ecareerscan[.]com  
evalswift[.]com  
livetalentpro[.]com  
quantumnodespro[.]com  
evalassesso[.]com  
parallel[.]eskillora[.]com  
coinbase[.]talentmonitoringtool[.]com  
uniswap[.]testforhire[.]com  
coinbase[.]talenthiringtool[.]com  
crosstheages[.]skillence360[.]com 
parallel [.] eskillprov [.] com 
assesstrack [.] com 
coinbase [.] talentmonitoringtool [.] com 
talent-hiringtalk[.]com 
uniswap[.]prehireiq[.]com 
fast-video-recording[.]com

Cisco Talos Blog – ​Read More

Code Execution Vulnerabilities Patched in Veeam, BeyondTrust Products

Veeam and BeyondTrust have resolved several vulnerabilities that could be exploited for remote code execution.

The post Code Execution Vulnerabilities Patched in Veeam, BeyondTrust Products appeared first on SecurityWeek.

SecurityWeek – ​Read More